These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33352895)
61. Photocatalytic hydrogel film assisted forward osmosis (PFO) for water treatment: Sustainable performance and contaminant control. Lu M; Zhang H; Tian Y; Yao W; Wang J; Wang Y J Hazard Mater; 2023 Oct; 460():132364. PubMed ID: 37634380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Enhanced flux and fouling resistance forward osmosis membrane based on a hydrogel/MOF hybrid selective layer. Fu W; Chen J; Li C; Jiang L; Qiu M; Li X; Wang Y; Cui L J Colloid Interface Sci; 2021 Mar; 585():158-166. PubMed ID: 33279698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Application of a nanofibrous composite membrane to the fertilizer-driven forward osmosis process for irrigation water use. An HK; Lee CG; Park SJ Environ Technol; 2017 Nov; 38(21):2700-2708. PubMed ID: 27973983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Forward osmosis for the treatment of reverse osmosis concentrate from water reclamation: process performance and fouling control. Kazner C; Jamil S; Phuntsho S; Shon HK; Wintgens T; Vigneswaran S Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(12):2431-7. PubMed ID: 24960004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Mesh-Embedded Polysulfone/Sulfonated Polysulfone Supported Thin Film Composite Membranes for Forward Osmosis. Zhao Y; Wang X; Ren Y; Pei D ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2018 Jan; 10(3):2918-2928. PubMed ID: 29278486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. The Water Flux Dynamic in a Hybrid Forward Osmosis-Membrane Distillation for Produced Water Treatment. Mat Nawi NI; Bilad MR; Anath G; Nordin NAH; Kurnia JC; Wibisono Y; Arahman N Membranes (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 32916834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Forward osmosis niches in seawater desalination and wastewater reuse. Valladares Linares R; Li Z; Sarp S; Bucs SS; Amy G; Vrouwenvelder JS Water Res; 2014 Dec; 66():122-139. PubMed ID: 25201336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Direct concentration of municipal sewage by forward osmosis and membrane fouling behavior. Gao Y; Fang Z; Liang P; Huang X Bioresour Technol; 2018 Jan; 247():730-735. PubMed ID: 30060407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Biofouling in forward osmosis systems: An experimental and numerical study. Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; Vrouwenvelder JS; Picioreanu C Water Res; 2016 Dec; 106():86-97. PubMed ID: 27697688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Membrane scaling and flux decline during fertiliser-drawn forward osmosis desalination of brackish groundwater. Phuntsho S; Lotfi F; Hong S; Shaffer DL; Elimelech M; Shon HK Water Res; 2014 Jun; 57():172-82. PubMed ID: 24721664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Enhancing the Efficiency of a Forward Osmosis Membrane with a Polydopamine/Graphene Oxide Layer Prepared Via the Modified Molecular Layer-by-Layer Method. Lin CF; Chung LH; Lin GY; Chang MC; Lee CY; Tai NH ACS Omega; 2020 Aug; 5(30):18738-18745. PubMed ID: 32775875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Effects of tannic acid on membrane fouling and membrane cleaning in forward osmosis. Zhang W; Wang L; Dong B Water Sci Technol; 2017 Dec; 76(11-12):3160-3170. PubMed ID: 29210702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Water recovery from sewage using forward osmosis. Lutchmiah K; Cornelissen ER; Harmsen DJ; Post JW; Lampi K; Ramaekers H; Rietveld LC; Roest K Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(7):1443-9. PubMed ID: 22179641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Removal of Co, Sr and Cs ions from simulated radioactive wastewater by forward osmosis. Liu X; Wu J; Hou LA; Wang J Chemosphere; 2019 Oct; 232():87-95. PubMed ID: 31152907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. A Short Review of Membrane Fouling in Forward Osmosis Processes. Chun Y; Mulcahy D; Zou L; Kim IS Membranes (Basel); 2017 Jun; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 28604649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Recovery of volatile fatty acids using forward osmosis: Influence of solution chemistry, temperature, and membrane orientation. Asghar N; Lee H; Jang D; Jang A Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 1):134814. PubMed ID: 35525449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. High performance nanofiber-supported thin film composite forward osmosis membranes based on continuous thermal-rolling pretreated electrospun PES/PAN blend substrates. Kallem P; Banat F; Yejin L; Choi H Chemosphere; 2020 Dec; 261():127687. PubMed ID: 32750620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Impact of humic acid fouling on membrane performance and transport of pharmaceutically active compounds in forward osmosis. Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(13):4567-75. PubMed ID: 23764606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Effect of Osmotic Pressure on Whey Protein Concentration in Forward Osmosis. Oymaci P; Offeringa PE; Borneman Z; Nijmeijer K Membranes (Basel); 2021 Jul; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34436336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]