174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33353125)
1. Focality of the Induced E-Field Is a Contributing Factor in the Choice of TMS Parameters: Evidence from a 3D Computational Model of the Human Brain.
Konakanchi D; de Jongh Curry AL; Waters RS; Narayana S
Brain Sci; 2020 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 33353125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TMS intensity and focality correlation with coil orientation at three non-motor regions.
Gomez-Feria J; Fernandez-Corazza M; Martin-Rodriguez JF; Mir P
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(5):. PubMed ID: 35081513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.
Gomez LJ; Goetz SM; Peterchev AV
J Neural Eng; 2018 Aug; 15(4):046033. PubMed ID: 29855433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atlas of optimal coil orientation and position for TMS: A computational study.
Gomez-Tames J; Hamasaka A; Laakso I; Hirata A; Ugawa Y
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(4):839-848. PubMed ID: 29699821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
Opitz A; Legon W; Rowlands A; Bickel WK; Paulus W; Tyler WJ
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():253-264. PubMed ID: 23644000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A semi-automated pipeline for finite element modeling of electric field induced in nonhuman primates by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Goswami N; Shen M; Gomez LJ; Dannhauer M; Sommer MA; Peterchev AV
J Neurosci Methods; 2024 Aug; 408():110176. PubMed ID: 38795980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.
Deng ZD; Lisanby SH; Peterchev AV
Brain Stimul; 2013 Jan; 6(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 22483681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trade-off between stimulation focality and the number of coils in multi-locus transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Nurmi S; Karttunen J; Souza VH; Ilmoniemi RJ; Nieminen JO
J Neural Eng; 2021 Nov; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 34673563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fast computational optimization of TMS coil placement for individualized electric field targeting.
Gomez LJ; Dannhauer M; Peterchev AV
Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117696. PubMed ID: 33385544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas.
Janssen AM; Oostendorp TF; Stegeman DF
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 May; 12():47. PubMed ID: 25981522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome measures for electric field modeling in tES and TMS: A systematic review and large-scale modeling study.
Van Hoornweder S; Nuyts M; Frieske J; Verstraelen S; Meesen RLJ; Caulfield KA
Neuroimage; 2023 Nov; 281():120379. PubMed ID: 37716590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. TAP: targeting and analysis pipeline for optimization and verification of coil placement in transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Dannhauer M; Huang Z; Beynel L; Wood E; Bukhari-Parlakturk N; Peterchev AV
J Neural Eng; 2022 Apr; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35377345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimum-energy coils for transcranial magnetic stimulation: application to focal stimulation.
Koponen LM; Nieminen JO; Ilmoniemi RJ
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 25458713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new angle on transcranial magnetic stimulation coil orientation: A targeted narrative review.
Cerins A; Thomas EHX; Barbour T; Taylor JJ; Siddiqi SH; Trapp N; McGirr A; Caulfield KA; Brown JC; Chen L
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38729243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Real-time computation of the TMS-induced electric field in a realistic head model.
Stenroos M; Koponen LM
Neuroimage; 2019 Dec; 203():116159. PubMed ID: 31494248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computational and experimental analysis of TMS-induced electric field vectors critical to neuronal activation.
Krieg TD; Salinas FS; Narayana S; Fox PT; Mogul DJ
J Neural Eng; 2015 Aug; 12(4):046014. PubMed ID: 26052136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How much detail is needed in modeling a transcranial magnetic stimulation figure-8 coil: Measurements and brain simulations.
Petrov PI; Mandija S; Sommer IEC; van den Berg CAT; Neggers SFW
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178952. PubMed ID: 28640923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic numerical assessment of occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields of transcranial magnetic stimulation.
D'Agostino S; Colella M; Liberti M; Falsaperla R; Apollonio F
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3416-3431. PubMed ID: 35196394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal and spatial profiles of evoked activity induced by magnetic stimulation using millimeter-sized coils in the mouse auditory cortex in vivo.
Yoshikawa T; Higuchi H; Furukawa R; Tateno T
Brain Res; 2022 Dec; 1796():148092. PubMed ID: 36115587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation method for in situ electric field in standardized human brain for different transcranial magnetic stimulation coils.
Iwahashi M; Gomez-Tames J; Laakso I; Hirata A
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2224-2238. PubMed ID: 28222046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
