These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33353451)

  • 61. Characteristics of women with mixed mass formation after evacuation following uterine artery chemoembolization for cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Sun QL; Wu XH; Luo L; Ying DM; Yang Y; Chen ZQ
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Apr; 297(4):1059-1066. PubMed ID: 29450694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
    Xiong X; Yan P; Gao C; Sun Q; Xu F
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():4762785. PubMed ID: 27340659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy type.
    Wu Y; Zhou L; Chen L; Zhou Q; Zeng T
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Nov; 98(44):e17741. PubMed ID: 31689823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Clinical value of MRI in cesarean scar pregnancy].
    Chong Y; Zhang K; Zhou Y; Han J; Zhu F; Guo H; Xiong G
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 49(12):914-8. PubMed ID: 25608992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The novel use of lauromacrogol: A respective study of ultrasound-guided sclerosant injection for cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Zhu L; Gao J; Yang X; Qian L; Wang Y; Zhang H; Chen B; Li D
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Jan; 48(1):140-145. PubMed ID: 34755427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The Application Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Assessing the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Lauromacrogol Injections in Cesarean Scar Pregnancies.
    Wu DM; Zhu L; Lin T; Chen S; Wu SS; Lin N
    J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Sep; 42(9):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 37129166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Case Series.
    Guo MH; Wang MF; Liu MM; Qi F; Qu F; Zhou JH
    Chin Med Sci J; 2015 Dec; 30(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 26960303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester.
    Timor-Tritsch IE; Monteagudo A; Cali G; El Refaey H; Kaelin Agten A; Arslan AA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):225.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26899908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A retrospective comparative study evaluating the efficacy of adding intra-arterial methotrexate infusion to uterine artery embolisation followed by curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Gao L; Hou YY; Sun F; Xia W; Yang Y; Tian T; Chen QF; Li XC
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 29497822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Evaluation of Cesarean section scar using saline contrast sonohysterography in women with previous Cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Pekar-Zlotin M; Maymon R; Nimrodi M; Zur-Naaman H; Melcer Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 63(4):551-555. PubMed ID: 37983614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Analysis of the efficacy of three treatment options for cesarean scar pregnancy management.
    Li YR; Xiao SS; Wan YJ; Xue M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Nov; 40(11):2146-51. PubMed ID: 25163835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Uterine artery embolization followed by dilation and curettage within 24 hours compared with systemic methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Gao L; Huang Z; Gao J; Mai H; Zhang Y; Wang X
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Nov; 127(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 25212971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Risk factors for poor hemostasis of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Tian H; Li S; Jia W; Yu K; Wu G
    J Int Med Res; 2020 Oct; 48(10):300060520964379. PubMed ID: 33467974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Clinical analysis of diagnosis and treatment of 13 cases with cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Wu QY; Ling J; Xue Q; Huang XZ; Tan J
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2014; 41(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 24779235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: An observational cohort study.
    Lin SY; Hsieh CJ; Tu YA; Li YP; Lee CN; Hsu WW; Shih JC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202020. PubMed ID: 30092014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Clinical assessment of uterine artery embolization combined with curettage when treating patients with cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study of 169 cases.
    Li X; Niu H; Li J; Zhang L; Qu Q
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1110-1116. PubMed ID: 32307813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Subsequent fertility after cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective analysis.
    Jin X; Liu M; Zhang P; Zheng L; Qi F
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 May; 23(1):337. PubMed ID: 37170216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Trichosanthin benefits the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancies.
    Li BL; Qian W; Chen QF
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(7):741-5. PubMed ID: 25692304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Methotrexate for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in a Chinese Population: A Meta-analysis.
    Qiao B; Zhang Z; Li Y
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1040-1048. PubMed ID: 27553186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Caesarean scar pregnancy: comparative efficacy and safety of treatment by uterine artery chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate injection.
    Wu X; Zhang X; Zhu J; Di W
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Mar; 161(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 22153905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.