144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33355535)
1. [Are self-ligating brackets more efficient than conventional brackets ? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled and split-mouth trials].
Wagner D; Lévy-Benichou H; Lefebvre F; Bolender Y
Orthod Fr; 2020 Dec; 91(4):303-321. PubMed ID: 33355535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is there any difference between conventional, passive and active self-ligating brackets? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Maizeray R; Wagner D; Lefebvre F; Lévy-Bénichou H; Bolender Y
Int Orthod; 2021 Dec; 19(4):523-538. PubMed ID: 34629309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Operating time for wire ligation with self-ligating and conventional brackets: A standardized in vitro study.
Cattaneo PM; Tepedino M; Hansen EB; Gram AR; Cornelis MA
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Dec; 8(6):1456-1466. PubMed ID: 36017763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Leveling and alignment time and the periodontal status in patients with severe upper crowding treated by corticotomy-assisted self-ligating brackets in comparison with conventional or self-ligating brackets only: a 3-arm randomized controlled clinical trial.
Al-Ibrahim HM; Hajeer MY; Alkhouri I; Zinah E
J World Fed Orthod; 2022 Feb; 11(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 34688577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of duration of extraction space closure and degree of root resorption with conventional and self-Ligation brackets.
Maurya RK; Bhardwaj P; Singh H; Mishra HA
Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 35946245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transversal changes, space closure, and efficiency of conventional and self-ligating appliances : A quantitative systematic review.
Yang X; Xue C; He Y; Zhao M; Luo M; Wang P; Bai D
J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jan; 79(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 29101414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of self-ligating brackets on oral hygiene and discomfort: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
Yang X; Su N; Shi Z; Xiang Z; He Y; Han X; Bai D
Int J Dent Hyg; 2017 Feb; 15(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 27095145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Root resorption during orthodontic treatment with self-ligating or conventional brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yi J; Li M; Li Y; Li X; Zhao Z
BMC Oral Health; 2016 Nov; 16(1):125. PubMed ID: 27871255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material.
Turnbull NR; Birnie DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 17346597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review.
Fleming PS; Johal A
Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 20050755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Time efficiency of self-ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systems.
Paduano S; Cioffi I; Iodice G; Rapuano A; Silva R
Prog Orthod; 2008; 9(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19350061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of anchorage loss between conventional and self-ligating brackets during canine retraction - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Malik DES; Fida M; Afzal E; Irfan S
Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 31866192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect of Using Self-ligating Brackets on Maxillary Canine Retraction: A Split-mouth Design Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hassan SE; Hajeer MY; Alali OH; Kaddah AS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jun; 17(6):496-503. PubMed ID: 27484605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment.
Tecco S; D'Attilio M; Tetè S; Festa F
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 19465738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of initial changes in pulpal blood flow between conventional and self-ligating fixed orthodontic brackets during leveling and alignment stage.
Abu Alhaija ES; Taha NA
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):971-981. PubMed ID: 32519238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Periodontal Health in Patients with Self-Ligating Brackets: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.
Mester A; Onisor F; Mesaros AS
J Clin Med; 2022 May; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 35566696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Porcelain brackets during initial alignment: are self-ligating cosmetic brackets more efficient?
Miles P; Weyant R
Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 20575195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective randomized split-mouth study on pain experience during chairside archwire manipulation in self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Bertl MH; Onodera K; Čelar AG
Angle Orthod; 2013 Mar; 83(2):292-7. PubMed ID: 22827479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26718381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
