159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33355846)
1. Impact of Screw Diameter and Length on Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength in Osteoporotic Vertebrae: A Finite Element Analysis.
Matsukawa K; Yato Y; Imabayashi H
Asian Spine J; 2021 Oct; 15(5):566-574. PubMed ID: 33355846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength among different sizes of pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal screw size for optimal fixation?
Matsukawa K; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Hosogane N; Abe Y; Asazuma T; Chiba K
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Mar; 158(3):465-71. PubMed ID: 26769471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of the fixation strength of lumbar pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: a finite element study.
Matsukawa K; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Hosogane N; Asazuma T; Nemoto K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):471-8. PubMed ID: 26161515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar pedicle screws in spondylolytic vertebrae: comparison of fixation strength between the traditional trajectory and a cortical bone trajectory.
Matsukawa K; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Hosogane N; Asazuma T; Chiba K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):910-5. PubMed ID: 26895531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of diagonal fixation in pedicle screw instrumentation.
Lim TH; Kim JG; Fujiwara A; Yoon TT; Lee SC; Ha JW; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Nov; 26(22):2498-503. PubMed ID: 11707718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A biomechanical study of the cortex-anchorage vertebral screw.
Lin LC; Chen HH; Sun SP
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Jul; 18(6):S25-32. PubMed ID: 12828911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adjustment of suboptimally placed lumbar pedicle screws decreases pullout strength and alters biomechanics of the construct: a pilot cadaveric study.
Wadhwa RK; Thakur JD; Khan IS; James J; Ahmed O; Zhang S; Henderson B; Ogden A; Guthikonda B; Nanda A
World Neurosurg; 2015 Mar; 83(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 24793978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of pedicle screw diameter on screw fixation efficacy in human osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae.
Lai DM; Shih YT; Chen YH; Chien A; Wang JL
J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():196-203. PubMed ID: 29126607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Thoracic pedicle screw fixation under axial and perpendicular loadings: A comprehensive numerical analysis.
Bianco RJ; Arnoux PJ; Mac-Thiong JM; Aubin CE
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Aug; 68():190-196. PubMed ID: 31238188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Benefits of Cement Augmentation of Pedicle Screw Fixation Are Increased in Osteoporotic Bone: A Finite Element Analysis.
Wang W; Baran GR; Garg H; Betz RR; Moumene M; Cahill PJ
Spine Deform; 2014 Jul; 2(4):248-259. PubMed ID: 27927345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection.
Helgeson MD; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Luhmann SJ
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):957-65. PubMed ID: 23602374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Evaluation of Cross Trajectory Technique for Pedicle Screw Insertion: Combined Use of Traditional Trajectory and Cortical Bone Trajectory.
Matsukawa K; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Hosogane N; Asazuma T; Nemoto K
Orthop Surg; 2015 Nov; 7(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 26792576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of fatigue strength of C2 pedicle screws, C2 pars screws, and a hybrid construct in C1-C2 fixation.
Su BW; Shimer AL; Chinthakunta S; Salloum K; Ames CP; Vaccaro AR; Bucklen B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(1):E12-9. PubMed ID: 24108297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modelling tri-cortical pedicle screw fixation in thoracic vertebrae under osteoporotic condition: A finite element analysis based on computed tomography.
Zhang W; Zhao J; Li L; Yu C; Zhao Y; Si H
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Apr; 187():105035. PubMed ID: 31443980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Biomechanical study and digital modeling of traction resistance in posterior thoracic implants].
Gayet LE; Hamcha H; Charbonneau A; Texereau J; Bertheau D; Bellicaud D; Pries P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Sep; 87(5):459-68. PubMed ID: 11547233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back-out.
Abshire BB; McLain RF; Valdevit A; Kambic HE
Spine J; 2001; 1(6):408-14. PubMed ID: 14588297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Fixation Strengths of Screws between the Traditional Trajectory and the Single and Double Endplate Penetrating Screw Trajectories Using Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Models Based on the Finite Element Method.
Takeuchi T; Takamizawa Y; Konishi K; Sano H; Takahashi M; Kouno H; Hosogane N
Asian Spine J; 2024 Feb; 18(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 38379149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cortical screws used to rescue failed lumbar pedicle screw construct: a biomechanical analysis.
Calvert GC; Lawrence BD; Abtahi AM; Bachus KN; Brodke DS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Feb; 22(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 25478820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of the pedicle screw insertion depth effect on screw stability under cyclic loading and subsequent pullout.
Karami KJ; Buckenmeyer LE; Kiapour AM; Kelkar PS; Goel VK; Demetropoulos CK; Soo TM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Apr; 28(3):E133-9. PubMed ID: 25310387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
