These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33355916)

  • 1. Mobilising the Next Generation of Stated-Preference Studies: the Association of Access Device with Choice Behaviour and Data Quality.
    Vass CM; Boeri M
    Patient; 2021 Jan; 14(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 33355916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: The Role of Survey Training Materials in Stated-Preference Studies.
    Vass CM; Davison NJ; Vander Stichele G; Payne K
    Patient; 2020 Apr; 13(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 31565784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does Device or Connection Type Affect Health Preferences in Online Surveys?
    Hartman JD; Craig BM
    Patient; 2019 Dec; 12(6):639-650. PubMed ID: 31364022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Survey Administration Mode on the Results of a Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiment: Online and Paper Comparison.
    Determann D; Lambooij MS; Steyerberg EW; de Bekker-Grob EW; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2017; 20(7):953-960. PubMed ID: 28712625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Preferences and Data Quality between Discrete Choice Experiments Conducted in Online and Face-to-Face Respondents.
    Jiang R; Pullenayegum E; Shaw JW; Mühlbacher A; Lee TA; Walton S; Kohlmann T; Norman R; Pickard AS
    Med Decis Making; 2023 Aug; 43(6):667-679. PubMed ID: 37199407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences.
    Skedgel CD; Wailoo AJ; Akehurst RL
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1227-40. PubMed ID: 23758539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preferences for HIV testing services among men who have sex with men in the UK: A discrete choice experiment.
    Miners A; Nadarzynski T; Witzel C; Phillips AN; Cambiano V; Rodger AJ; Llewellyn CD
    PLoS Med; 2019 Apr; 16(4):e1002779. PubMed ID: 30973868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling Heterogeneity in Patients' Preferences for Psoriasis Treatments in a Multicountry Study: A Comparison Between Random-Parameters Logit and Latent Class Approaches.
    Boeri M; Saure D; Schacht A; Riedl E; Hauber B
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Jun; 38(6):593-606. PubMed ID: 32128726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attribute nonattendance in COVID-19 vaccine choice: A discrete choice experiment based on Chinese public preference.
    Xiao J; Wang F; Wang M; Ma Z
    Health Expect; 2022 Jun; 25(3):959-970. PubMed ID: 35049117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences.
    Veldwijk J; Smith IP; Oliveri S; Petrocchi S; Smith MY; Lanzoni L; Janssens R; Huys I; de Wit GA; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Feb; 44(2):203-216. PubMed ID: 38178591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do people have differing motivations for participating in a stated-preference study? Results from a latent-class analysis.
    Hollin IL; Janssen E; Kelley MA; Bridges JFP
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Feb; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 33549068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems.
    Heidenreich S; Watson V; Ryan M; Phimister E
    Health Econ; 2018 Jan; 27(1):157-171. PubMed ID: 28620975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.
    Armeni P; Meregaglia M; Borsoi L; Callea G; Torbica A; Benazzo F; Tarricone R
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):886-900. PubMed ID: 37837325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrete choice analysis of health worker job preferences in Ethiopia: Separating attribute non-attendance from taste heterogeneity.
    Arora N; Quaife M; Hanson K; Lagarde M; Woldesenbet D; Seifu A; Crastes Dit Sourd R
    Health Econ; 2022 May; 31(5):806-819. PubMed ID: 35178825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.
    Ozdemir S; Lee JJ; Chaudhry I; Ocampo RRQ
    Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 34085205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.
    Jiang MZ; Fu Q; Xiong JY; Li XL; Jia EP; Peng YY; Shen X
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 May; 20(1):430. PubMed ID: 32423447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Young people's preferences for the use of emerging technologies for asymptomatic regular chlamydia testing and management: a discrete choice experiment in England.
    Eaton S; Biggerstaff D; Petrou S; Osipenko L; Gibbs J; Estcourt CS; Sadiq T; Szczepura A
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jan; 9(1):e023663. PubMed ID: 30700477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report.
    Mulhern B; Bansback N; Brazier J; Buckingham K; Cairns J; Devlin N; Dolan P; Hole AR; Kavetsos G; Longworth L; Rowen D; Tsuchiya A
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(12):vii-xxvi, 1-191. PubMed ID: 24568945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.