These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33355930)

  • 1. Suppression of the auditory N1 by visual anticipatory motion is modulated by temporal and identity predictability.
    van Laarhoven T; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Mar; 58(3):e13749. PubMed ID: 33355930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal and identity prediction in visual-auditory events: Electrophysiological evidence from stimulus omissions.
    van Laarhoven T; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 1661():79-87. PubMed ID: 28216241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual anticipatory information modulates multisensory interactions of artificial audiovisual stimuli.
    Vroomen J; Stekelenburg JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 22(7):1583-96. PubMed ID: 19583474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive coding of visual-auditory and motor-auditory events: An electrophysiological study.
    Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():88-96. PubMed ID: 25641042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of when, what and how predictions on auditory speech perception.
    Pinto S; Tremblay P; Basirat A; Sato M
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 237(12):3143-3153. PubMed ID: 31576421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual form predictions facilitate auditory processing at the N1.
    Paris T; Kim J; Davis C
    Neuroscience; 2017 Feb; 343():157-164. PubMed ID: 27646290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The N1-suppression effect for self-initiated sounds is independent of attention.
    Timm J; SanMiguel I; Saupe K; Schröger E
    BMC Neurosci; 2013 Jan; 14():2. PubMed ID: 23281832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensory attenuation is modulated by the contrasting effects of predictability and control.
    Harrison AW; Mannion DJ; Jack BN; Griffiths O; Hughes G; Whitford TJ
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118103. PubMed ID: 33957233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictability of higher-order temporal structure of musical stimuli is associated with auditory evoked response.
    Dauer T; Nerness B; Fujioka T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jul; 153():53-64. PubMed ID: 32325078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Seeing the Intensity of a Sound-producing Event Modulates the Amplitude of the Initial Auditory Evoked Response.
    Libesman S; Mannion DJ; Whitford TJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 32(3):426-434. PubMed ID: 31659925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural correlates of multisensory integration of ecologically valid audiovisual events.
    Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1964-73. PubMed ID: 17892381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensory attenuation prevails when controlling for temporal predictability of self- and externally generated tones.
    Klaffehn AL; Baess P; Kunde W; Pfister R
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Sep; 132():107145. PubMed ID: 31319119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cortical processes underlying the effects of static sound timing on perceived visual speed.
    Kaya U; Kafaligonul H
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():194-205. PubMed ID: 31136793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensory suppression effects to self-initiated sounds reflect the attenuation of the unspecific N1 component of the auditory ERP.
    SanMiguel I; Todd J; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Apr; 50(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 23351131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suppression of the N1 auditory evoked potential for sounds generated by the upper and lower limbs.
    van Elk M; Salomon R; Kannape O; Blanke O
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Oct; 102():108-17. PubMed ID: 25019590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Presentation Probability of Visual-Auditory Pairs Modulates Visually Induced Auditory Predictions.
    Stuckenberg MV; Schröger E; Widmann A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 31(8):1110-1125. PubMed ID: 30912727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reduced N1 to self-generated tones: an effect of temporal predictability?
    Lange K
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1088-95. PubMed ID: 21261634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Listening strategy for auditory rhythms modulates neural correlates of expectancy and cognitive processing.
    Snyder JS; Pasinski AC; McAuley JD
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Feb; 48(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 20557484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.
    Kafaligonul H; Stoner GR
    J Vis; 2012; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 23035130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal boundary of auditory event formation: An electrophysiological marker.
    Simon J; Balla V; Winkler I
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jun; 140():53-61. PubMed ID: 31009644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.