126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33357762)
1. Construction and validity of a midsagittal plane based on the symmetry of a 3-dimensional model of the relevant cranial base.
Feng B; Wang Y; Ouyang W; Yu M; Wang H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jan; 159(1):e49-e58. PubMed ID: 33357762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel method of constructing a stable reference frame for 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
Zhang D; Wang S; Li J; Zhou Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 30173843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the anterior cranial base to provide a reliable reference plane for patients with or without facial asymmetry.
Feng B; Yu X; Wang Y; Ouyang W; Wu F; Yu M; Chen Q
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e230-e245. PubMed ID: 36055884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy and reliability of different midsagittal planes in the symmetry assessment using cone-beam computed tomography.
Yu S; Zheng Y; Dong L; Huang W; Wu H; Zhang Q; Yan X; Wu W; Lv T; Yuan X
Clin Anat; 2024 Mar; 37(2):218-226. PubMed ID: 38186377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simple and accurate craniofacial midsagittal plane definition.
Green MN; Bloom JM; Kulbersh R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 28863916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Landmark-based midsagittal plane analysis in patients with facial symmetry and asymmetry based on CBCT analysis tomography.
Dobai A; Markella Z; Vízkelety T; Fouquet C; Rosta A; Barabás J
J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Nov; 79(6):371-379. PubMed ID: 30255320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Construction and validation of the midsagittal reference plane based on the skull base symmetry for three-dimensional cephalometric craniofacial analysis.
Kim HJ; Kim BC; Kim JG; Zhengguo P; Kang SH; Lee SH
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 24469365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of two midsagittal planes in three-dimensional analysis and their measurement in patients with skeletal mandibular deviation: a comparative study.
Zheng X; Wang L; Zhang B; Bai X; Qin K; Tian Y; Zhao R; Liu S; Wang J; Zhao Z
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(7):600-606. PubMed ID: 29980353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods.
Ghoneima A; Cho H; Farouk K; Kula K
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Nov; 20(4):227-236. PubMed ID: 28960842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional craniofacial cone-beam CT superimposition method based on voxel registration].
Zhou GH; Chen L; Sun YY; Ge N; Su L; Bai YX
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):475-9. PubMed ID: 27511038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Growth changes in the anterior and middle cranial bases assessed with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents.
Afrand M; Oh H; Flores-Mir C; Lagravère-Vich MO
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):342-350.e2. PubMed ID: 28153164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. United Reference Method for three-dimensional treatment evaluation.
Shahen S; Lagravère MO; Carrino G; Fahim F; Abdelsalam R; Flores-Mir C; Perillo L
Prog Orthod; 2018 Dec; 19(1):47. PubMed ID: 30506410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional McNamara Cephalometric Analysis.
Santos RMGD; De Martino JM; Haiter Neto F; Passeri LA
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 29(4):895-899. PubMed ID: 29381618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and Validation of Novel Three-Dimensional Craniofacial Landmarks on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
Liberton DK; Verma P; Contratto A; Lee JS
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):e611-e615. PubMed ID: 31478954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.
Sam A; Currie K; Oh H; Flores-Mir C; Lagravére-Vich M
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):317-332. PubMed ID: 30423256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new methodology for automatic detection of reference points in 3D cephalometry: A pilot study.
Ed-Dhahraouy M; Riri H; Ezzahmouly M; Bourzgui F; El Moutaoukkil A
Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):328-337. PubMed ID: 29628421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetry through cone-beam computerized tomography.
Cevidanes LH; Alhadidi A; Paniagua B; Styner M; Ludlow J; Mol A; Turvey T; Proffit WR; Rossouw PE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jun; 111(6):757-70. PubMed ID: 21497527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
