These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

836 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33358543)

  • 1. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mazzone E; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Basile G; Cignoli D; Cirulli GO; Sorce G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Cucchiara V; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 33358543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhu K; Qin Z; Xue J; Miao C; Tian Y; Liu S; Zhu S; Gu Q; Hou C; Xu A; Yang J; Wang Z
    Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Dec; 8(6):741-753. PubMed ID: 32038971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
    Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
    Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Diagnostic efficacy of prostate cancer using targeted biopsy with 6-core systematic biopsy for patients with PI-RADS 5].
    Liu Y; Yuan CW; Wu JY; Shen Q; Xiao JX; Zhao Z; Wang XY; Li XS; He ZS; Zhou LQ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Oct; 55(5):812-817. PubMed ID: 37807733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variability of mpMRI diagnostic performance according to the upfront individual patient risk of having clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Sorce G; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; Cirulli GO; Quarta L; Leni R; Robesti D; Brembilla G; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Prostate; 2024 Apr; 84(5):473-478. PubMed ID: 38149793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.
    Arcot R; Sekar S; Kotamarti S; Krischak M; Michael ZD; Foo WC; Huang J; Polascik TJ; Gupta RT
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Aug; 47(8):2917-2927. PubMed ID: 35674785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Added Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Selecting Prostate Biopsy Candidates Among Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and PI-RADS ≥3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Systematic Assessment by PI-RADS Score.
    Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Sorce G; Quarta L; Robesti D; Cannoletta D; Cirulli G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Mazzone E; de Angelis M; Brembilla G; De Cobelli F; Salonia A; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Gandaglia G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2024 Jul; 10(4):634-640. PubMed ID: 37865591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the need for systematic biopsies in addition to targeted biopsies according to the characteristics of the index lesion at mpMRI. Results from a large, multi-institutional database.
    Barletta F; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Scuderi S; Brembilla G; de Angelis M; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Karnes RJ; Roupret M; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    World J Urol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):2683-2688. PubMed ID: 36149448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does previous prostate surgery affect multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer? Results from a single institution series.
    Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Sorce G; Barletta F; De Angelis M; Brembilla G; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Prostate; 2022 Sep; 82(12):1170-1175. PubMed ID: 35538401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.
    Araújo D; Gromicho A; Dias J; Bastos S; Maciel RM; Sabença A; Xambre L
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Dec; 95(4):11830. PubMed ID: 38117217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical available decision support scheme for optimizing prostate biopsy based on mpMRI.
    Hou Y; Jiang KW; Zhang J; Bao ML; Shi HB; Qu JR; Cheng G; Zhang YD
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Apr; 25(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 35067674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Sathianathen NJ; Omer A; Harriss E; Davies L; Kasivisvanathan V; Punwani S; Moore CM; Kastner C; Barrett T; Van Den Bergh RC; Eddy BA; Gleeson F; Macpherson R; Bryant RJ; Catto JWF; Murphy DG; Hamdy FC; Ahmed HU; Lamb AD
    Eur Urol; 2020 Sep; 78(3):402-414. PubMed ID: 32444265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel.
    Moldovan PC; Van den Broeck T; Sylvester R; Marconi L; Bellmunt J; van den Bergh RCN; Bolla M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; Fossati N; Gross T; Henry AM; Joniau S; van der Kwast TH; Matveev VB; van der Poel HG; De Santis M; Schoots IG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TB; Rouvière O
    Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):250-266. PubMed ID: 28336078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
    Otti VC; Miller C; Powell RJ; Thomas RM; McGrath JS
    BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29804315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors Influencing Variability in the Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Stabile A; Giganti F; Kasivisvanathan V; Giannarini G; Moore CM; Padhani AR; Panebianco V; Rosenkrantz AB; Salomon G; Turkbey B; Villeirs G; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 3(2):145-167. PubMed ID: 32192942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy.
    Hansen NL; Kesch C; Barrett T; Koo B; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Schlemmer HP; Warren AY; Wieczorek K; Hohenfellner M; Kastner C; Hadaschik B
    BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):631-638. PubMed ID: 27862869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy: Comparing prostate cancer detection between targeted and systematic biopsy.
    Oderda M; Albisinni S; Benamran D; Calleris G; Ciccariello M; Dematteis A; Diamand R; Descotes JL; Fiard G; Forte V; Giacobbe A; Marquis A; Marra G; Messas A; Muto G; Peltier A; Rius L; Simone G; Roumeguere T; Faletti R; Gontero P
    Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 36259316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to optimize follow-up in patients with a suspicious multiparametric MRI and a subsequent negative targeted prostate biopsy. Results from a large, single-institution series.
    Barletta F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Brembilla G; Sorce G; Pellegrino F; Scuderi S; Cannoletta D; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):103.e17-103.e24. PubMed ID: 34688534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.