BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

777 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33358543)

  • 1. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mazzone E; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Basile G; Cignoli D; Cirulli GO; Sorce G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Cucchiara V; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 33358543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhu K; Qin Z; Xue J; Miao C; Tian Y; Liu S; Zhu S; Gu Q; Hou C; Xu A; Yang J; Wang Z
    Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Dec; 8(6):741-753. PubMed ID: 32038971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
    Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
    Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Diagnostic efficacy of prostate cancer using targeted biopsy with 6-core systematic biopsy for patients with PI-RADS 5].
    Liu Y; Yuan CW; Wu JY; Shen Q; Xiao JX; Zhao Z; Wang XY; Li XS; He ZS; Zhou LQ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Oct; 55(5):812-817. PubMed ID: 37807733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variability of mpMRI diagnostic performance according to the upfront individual patient risk of having clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Sorce G; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; Cirulli GO; Quarta L; Leni R; Robesti D; Brembilla G; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Prostate; 2024 Apr; 84(5):473-478. PubMed ID: 38149793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.
    Arcot R; Sekar S; Kotamarti S; Krischak M; Michael ZD; Foo WC; Huang J; Polascik TJ; Gupta RT
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Aug; 47(8):2917-2927. PubMed ID: 35674785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Added Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Selecting Prostate Biopsy Candidates Among Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and PI-RADS ≥3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Systematic Assessment by PI-RADS Score.
    Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Sorce G; Quarta L; Robesti D; Cannoletta D; Cirulli G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Mazzone E; de Angelis M; Brembilla G; De Cobelli F; Salonia A; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Gandaglia G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37865591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the need for systematic biopsies in addition to targeted biopsies according to the characteristics of the index lesion at mpMRI. Results from a large, multi-institutional database.
    Barletta F; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Scuderi S; Brembilla G; de Angelis M; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Karnes RJ; Roupret M; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    World J Urol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):2683-2688. PubMed ID: 36149448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does previous prostate surgery affect multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer? Results from a single institution series.
    Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Sorce G; Barletta F; De Angelis M; Brembilla G; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Prostate; 2022 Sep; 82(12):1170-1175. PubMed ID: 35538401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.
    Araújo D; Gromicho A; Dias J; Bastos S; Maciel RM; Sabença A; Xambre L
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Dec; 95(4):11830. PubMed ID: 38117217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical available decision support scheme for optimizing prostate biopsy based on mpMRI.
    Hou Y; Jiang KW; Zhang J; Bao ML; Shi HB; Qu JR; Cheng G; Zhang YD
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Apr; 25(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 35067674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Sathianathen NJ; Omer A; Harriss E; Davies L; Kasivisvanathan V; Punwani S; Moore CM; Kastner C; Barrett T; Van Den Bergh RC; Eddy BA; Gleeson F; Macpherson R; Bryant RJ; Catto JWF; Murphy DG; Hamdy FC; Ahmed HU; Lamb AD
    Eur Urol; 2020 Sep; 78(3):402-414. PubMed ID: 32444265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
    Xu L; Zhang G; Shi B; Liu Y; Zou T; Yan W; Xiao Y; Xue H; Feng F; Lei J; Jin Z; Sun H
    Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 31864408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel.
    Moldovan PC; Van den Broeck T; Sylvester R; Marconi L; Bellmunt J; van den Bergh RCN; Bolla M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; Fossati N; Gross T; Henry AM; Joniau S; van der Kwast TH; Matveev VB; van der Poel HG; De Santis M; Schoots IG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TB; Rouvière O
    Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):250-266. PubMed ID: 28336078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
    Otti VC; Miller C; Powell RJ; Thomas RM; McGrath JS
    BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29804315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors Influencing Variability in the Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Stabile A; Giganti F; Kasivisvanathan V; Giannarini G; Moore CM; Padhani AR; Panebianco V; Rosenkrantz AB; Salomon G; Turkbey B; Villeirs G; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 3(2):145-167. PubMed ID: 32192942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy.
    Hansen NL; Kesch C; Barrett T; Koo B; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Schlemmer HP; Warren AY; Wieczorek K; Hohenfellner M; Kastner C; Hadaschik B
    BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):631-638. PubMed ID: 27862869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy: Comparing prostate cancer detection between targeted and systematic biopsy.
    Oderda M; Albisinni S; Benamran D; Calleris G; Ciccariello M; Dematteis A; Diamand R; Descotes JL; Fiard G; Forte V; Giacobbe A; Marquis A; Marra G; Messas A; Muto G; Peltier A; Rius L; Simone G; Roumeguere T; Faletti R; Gontero P
    Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 36259316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.