338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33359174)
1. Practice variation in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at benign abdominal hysterectomy: a population-based study.
Cusimano MC; Moineddin R; Chiu M; Ferguson SE; Aktar S; Liu N; Baxter NN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):585.e1-585.e30. PubMed ID: 33359174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk-reducing Bilateral Salpingo-oophorectomy: Assessing the Incidence of Occult Ovarian Cancer and Surgeon Adherence to Recommended Practices.
Newcomb LK; Toal CT; Rindos NB; Wang L; Mansuria SM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1511-1515. PubMed ID: 31927044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of benign hysterectomy among females with disabilities: a population-based cross-sectional study.
Scime NV; Brown HK; Metcalfe A; Simpson AN; Brennand EA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):658.e1-658.e17. PubMed ID: 37544349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer risk after hysterectomy with and without salpingo-oophorectomy for benign indications.
Chow S; Raine-Bennett T; Samant ND; Postlethwaite DA; Holzapfel M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 223(6):900.e1-900.e7. PubMed ID: 32585221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy and all-cause and cause-specific mortality.
Tuesley KM; Protani MM; Webb PM; Dixon-Suen SC; Wilson LF; Stewart LM; Jordan SJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):723.e1-723.e16. PubMed ID: 32376318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ovarian cancer incidence and death in average-risk women undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at benign hysterectomy.
Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE; Moineddin R; Chiu M; Aktar S; Liu N; Baxter NN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):220.e1-220.e26. PubMed ID: 34563499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inappropriate oophorectomy at time of benign premenopausal hysterectomy.
Mahal AS; Rhoads KF; Elliott CS; Sokol ER
Menopause; 2017 Aug; 24(8):947-953. PubMed ID: 28486247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unnecessary bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy and potential for ovarian preservation.
Wong J; Murji A; Sunderji Z; Chow O; Shapiro J; Wolfman W; Shirreff L
Menopause; 2020 Sep; 28(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 32898023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-hospital complications of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at benign hysterectomy: a population-based cohort study.
Lai JC; Chen HH; Chu KH; Wang KL; Huang N; Hu HY; Chou YJ
Menopause; 2017 Feb; 24(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 27779566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with all cause and cause specific mortality: population based cohort study.
Cusimano MC; Chiu M; Ferguson SE; Moineddin R; Aktar S; Liu N; Baxter NN
BMJ; 2021 Dec; 375():e067528. PubMed ID: 34880044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hospital variation in responses to safety warnings about power morcellation in hysterectomy.
Xu X; Desai VB; Wright JD; Lin H; Schwartz PE; Gross CP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):589.e1-589.e13. PubMed ID: 33359176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intention matters: Success rate of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Messingschlager C; Ferrando CA; Chang OH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Apr; 283():54-58. PubMed ID: 36773471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy among Taiwanese women undergoing benign hysterectomy: a population-based, pooled, cross-sectional study.
Lai JC; Huang N; Wang KL; Hu HY; Chen IT; Chou YJ
Menopause; 2015 Jul; 22(7):765-72. PubMed ID: 25387346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The risk of stroke after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at hysterectomy for benign diseases: A nationwide cohort study.
Lai JC; Chou YJ; Huang N; Chen HH; Wang KL; Wang CW; Shen IH; Chang HC
Maturitas; 2018 Aug; 114():27-33. PubMed ID: 29907243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term outcomes of hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hassan H; Allen I; Sofianopoulou E; Walburga Y; Turnbull C; Eccles DM; Tischkowitz M; Pharoah P; Antoniou AC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jan; 230(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 37364803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgeon Re-Excision Rates after Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Measure of Low-Value Care.
Kaczmarski K; Wang P; Gilmore R; Overton HN; Euhus DM; Jacobs LK; Habibi M; Camp M; Weiss MJ; Makary MA
J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Apr; 228(4):504-512.e2. PubMed ID: 30703538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elective oophorectomy in the United States: trends and in-hospital complications, 1998-2006.
Asante A; Whiteman MK; Kulkarni A; Cox S; Marchbanks PA; Jamieson DJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 116(5):1088-95. PubMed ID: 20966693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adherence to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy guidelines among gynecologic oncologists compared to general gynecologists.
Blustein P; Werner SR; Uppalapati P; Leung TM; Husk GA; Pereira EB; Whyte JS; Villella JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Sep; 229(3):280.e1-280.e8. PubMed ID: 37308046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of female sexual function in women who underwent abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
Doğanay M; Kokanalı D; Kokanalı MK; Cavkaytar S; Aksakal OS
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 48(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 30445203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient and Surgery Characteristics of Inpatient Hysterectomies Among Transgender Individuals.
Colman DE; Beltran TG; Weber JM; Erkanli A; Robinson WR; Myers ER; Gray BA
LGBT Health; 2023 Oct; 10(7):544-551. PubMed ID: 37252769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]