These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33359812)

  • 1. Standardization in Performing and Interpreting Electrocardiograms.
    Ajmal M; Marcus F
    Am J Med; 2021 Apr; 134(4):430-434. PubMed ID: 33359812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competency in interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: a summary and appraisal of published evidence.
    Salerno SM; Alguire PC; Waxman HS
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 May; 138(9):751-60. PubMed ID: 12729431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The emergency department versus the computer: which is the better electrocardiographer?
    Snyder CS; Fenrich AL; Friedman RA; Macias C; O'Reilly K; Kertesz NJ
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2003; 24(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 12457259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emergency physician accuracy in interpreting electrocardiograms with potential ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Is it enough?
    Veronese G; Germini F; Ingrassia S; Cutuli O; Donati V; Bonacchini L; Marcucci M; Fabbri A;
    Acute Card Care; 2016 Mar; 18(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 27759433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Training and competency evaluation for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: recommendations from the American College of Physicians.
    Salerno SM; Alguire PC; Waxman HS;
    Ann Intern Med; 2003 May; 138(9):747-50. PubMed ID: 12729430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does a computer-based ECG-recorder interpret electrocardiograms more efficiently than physicians?
    Jakobsson A; Ohlin P; Pahlm O
    Clin Physiol; 1985 Oct; 5(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 3902333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified electrode placement must be recorded when performing 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Jowett NI; Turner AM; Cole A; Jones PA
    Postgrad Med J; 2005 Feb; 81(952):122-5. PubMed ID: 15701746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic conclusions from the EASI-derived 12-lead electrocardiogram as compared with the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram in children.
    Welinder A; Feild DQ; Liebman J; Maynard C; Wagner GS; Wettrell G; Pahlm O
    Am Heart J; 2006 May; 151(5):1059-64. PubMed ID: 16644336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of electrode misplacement on clinicians' interpretation of the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram.
    Bond RR; Finlay DD; Nugent CD; Breen C; Guldenring D; Daly MJ
    Eur J Intern Med; 2012 Oct; 23(7):610-5. PubMed ID: 22939805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognizing and reducing interference on 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Davies A
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Jul 12-25; 16(13):800-4. PubMed ID: 17851333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of ECG interpretation in competitive athletes: the impact of using standised ECG criteria.
    Drezner JA; Asif IM; Owens DS; Prutkin JM; Salerno JC; Fean R; Rao AL; Stout K; Harmon KG
    Br J Sports Med; 2012 Apr; 46(5):335-40. PubMed ID: 22310648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic accuracy of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction by various healthcare providers.
    Huitema AA; Zhu T; Alemayehu M; Lavi S
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 177(3):825-9. PubMed ID: 25465827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential solutions for providing standard electrocardiogram recordings from nonstandard recording sites.
    Pahlm O; Wagner GS
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 18433611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of twelve-lead electrocardiogram using a glove-based recording system with standard methodology.
    Luc M; Fintel DJ; Klein HO; Childers R; Mor-Avi V; Tzivoni D; Lang RM
    Am J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 112(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 23756546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy in interpreting the paediatric ECG: a UK-wide study and the need for improvement.
    Jheeta JS; Narayan O; Krasemann T
    Arch Dis Child; 2014 Jul; 99(7):646-8. PubMed ID: 24625668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How well is each learner learning? Validity investigation of a learning curve-based assessment approach for ECG interpretation.
    Hatala R; Gutman J; Lineberry M; Triola M; Pusic M
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2019 Mar; 24(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 30171512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of electrocardiogram interpretations by family physicians, a computer, and a cardiology service.
    Woolley D; Henck M; Luck J
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Apr; 34(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 1556536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of competency in electrocardiogram interpretation of graduating physician assistant students.
    Lundberg EL; Stagnaro-Green A; Zhang Y; LeLacheur S; Jablonover R
    J Physician Assist Educ; 2013; 24(4):15-8. PubMed ID: 24616954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relative accuracies of ECG precordial lead waveforms derived from EASI leads and those acquired from paramedic applied standard leads.
    Sejersten M; Pahlm O; Pettersson J; Clemmensen PM; Rautaharju F; Zhou S; Maynard C; Feldman CL; Wagner GS
    J Electrocardiol; 2003 Jul; 36(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 12942479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes: the 'Seattle criteria'.
    Drezner JA; Ackerman MJ; Anderson J; Ashley E; Asplund CA; Baggish AL; Börjesson M; Cannon BC; Corrado D; DiFiori JP; Fischbach P; Froelicher V; Harmon KG; Heidbuchel H; Marek J; Owens DS; Paul S; Pelliccia A; Prutkin JM; Salerno JC; Schmied CM; Sharma S; Stein R; Vetter VL; Wilson MG
    Br J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 47(3):122-4. PubMed ID: 23303758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.