183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33360343)
1. The effects of sketching while narrating on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S; Burkhardt J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103236. PubMed ID: 33360343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of a model statement on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jun; 207():103080. PubMed ID: 32413731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Model Sketch for Enhancing Lie Detection and Eliciting Information.
Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S; Mann S; Burkhardt J
Brain Sci; 2022 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 36138916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cues to deception: can complications, common knowledge details, and self-handicapping strategies discriminate between truths, embedded lies and outright lies in an Italian-speaking sample?
Caso L; Cavagnis L; Vrij A; Palena N
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1128194. PubMed ID: 37179853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews.
Vrij A; Leal S; Mann S; Dalton G; Jo E; Shaboltas A; Khaleeva M; Granskaya J; Houston K
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():44-53. PubMed ID: 28477454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Insurance based lie detection: Enhancing the verifiability approach with a model statement component.
Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Lafferty M; Nahari G
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():1-8. PubMed ID: 28088655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality.
Harvey AC; Vrij A; Leal S; Deeb H; Hope L; Mann S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103130. PubMed ID: 32683098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proportion of complications in interpreter-absent and interpreter-present interviews.
Vrij A; Leal S
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(1):155-164. PubMed ID: 32284786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unraveling the Misconception About Deception and Nervous Behavior.
Vrij A; Fisher RP
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1377. PubMed ID: 32625154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strategic Interviewing to Detect Deception: Cues to Deception across Repeated Interviews.
Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; Martínez C; Herrero C; Ibabe I
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1702. PubMed ID: 27847493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An empirical test of the behaviour analysis interview.
Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 16718581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A stability bias effect among deceivers.
Harvey AC; Vrij A; Hope L; Leal S; Mann S
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):519-529. PubMed ID: 28726439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detecting true and false opinions: The Devil's Advocate approach as a lie detection aid.
Leal S; Vrij A; Mann S; Fisher RP
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 20398882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Please tell me all you remember': a comparison between British and Arab interviewees' free narrative performance and its implications for lie detection.
Vrij A; Leal S; Mann S; Vernham Z; Dalton G; Serok-Jeppa O; Rozmann N; Nahari G; Fisher RP
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(4):546-559. PubMed ID: 35558151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statements about true and false intentions: using the Cognitive Interview to magnify the differences.
Sooniste T; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Vrij A
Scand J Psychol; 2015 Aug; 56(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 25929812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the efficacy of baselining in deception detection: A comparative analysis of the reality interview and structured interview.
Bogaard G; van de Bovekamp AM; Colwell K
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Feb; 242():104112. PubMed ID: 38070326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The reliability of lie detection performance.
Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: the benefit of recalling an event in reverse order.
Vrij A; Mann SA; Fisher RP; Leal S; Milne R; Bull R
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 17694424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
