427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33360739)
1. Impact of waste processing byproducts on the carbon footprint of integrated waste-to-energy strategies.
Abdallah M; Elfeky A
J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 280():111839. PubMed ID: 33360739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental impact assessment of the current, emerging, and alternative waste management systems using life cycle assessment tools: a case study of Johannesburg, South Africa.
Adeleke O; Akinlabi SA; Jen TC; Dunmade I
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(5):7366-7381. PubMed ID: 34476692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Life cycle assessment for municipal solid waste management: a case study from Ahvaz, Iran.
Zarea MA; Moazed H; Ahmadmoazzam M; Malekghasemi S; Jaafarzadeh N
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Feb; 191(3):131. PubMed ID: 30725189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of carbon footprint emissions and environmental concerns of solid waste treatment and disposal techniques; case study of Malaysia.
Malakahmad A; Abualqumboz MS; Kutty SRM; Abunama TJ
Waste Manag; 2017 Dec; 70():282-292. PubMed ID: 28935377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of MRF residue as alternative fuel in cement production.
Fyffe JR; Breckel AC; Townsend AK; Webber ME
Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):276-84. PubMed ID: 26187294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.
Jeswani HK; Azapagic A
Waste Manag; 2016 Apr; 50():346-63. PubMed ID: 26906085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Carbon footprint associated with four disposal scenarios for urban pruning waste.
Araújo YRV; de Góis ML; Junior LMC; Carvalho M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jan; 25(2):1863-1868. PubMed ID: 29103114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).
Bogner J; Pipatti R; Hashimoto S; Diaz C; Mareckova K; Diaz L; Kjeldsen P; Monni S; Faaij A; Gao Q; Zhang T; Ahmed MA; Sutamihardja RT; Gregory R;
Waste Manag Res; 2008 Feb; 26(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 18338699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic and environmental life cycle assessment of organic waste treatment by means of incineration and biogasification. Is source segregation of biowaste justified in Germany?
Mayer F; Bhandari R; Gäth SA; Himanshu H; Stobernack N
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 721():137731. PubMed ID: 32208225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Life cycle assessment of potential municipal solid waste management strategies for Mumbai, India.
Sharma BK; Chandel MK
Waste Manag Res; 2017 Jan; 35(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 27872406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating environmental impacts of alternative construction waste management approaches using supply-chain-linked life-cycle analysis.
Kucukvar M; Egilmez G; Tatari O
Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jun; 32(6):500-8. PubMed ID: 24855225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Solid digestate disposal strategies to reduce the environmental impact and energy consumption of food waste-based biogas systems.
Chen T; Qiu X; Feng H; Yin J; Shen D
Bioresour Technol; 2021 Apr; 325():124706. PubMed ID: 33485081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Life cycle assessment of integrated waste management systems for alternative legacy scenarios of the London Olympic Park.
Parkes O; Lettieri P; Bogle ID
Waste Manag; 2015 Jun; 40():157-66. PubMed ID: 25837786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental impact of rejected materials generated in organic fraction of municipal solid waste anaerobic digestion plants: Comparison of wet and dry process layout.
Colazo AB; Sánchez A; Font X; Colón J
Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():84-97. PubMed ID: 26123979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Areas on which to focus when seeking to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of commercial waste management. A case study of a hypermarket, Finland.
Hupponen M; Grönman K; Horttanainen M
Waste Manag; 2018 Jun; 76():1-18. PubMed ID: 29576513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Life cycle assessment of waste management in rural areas in the transition period from mixed collection to source-separation.
Liao N; Lü F; Zhang H; He P
Waste Manag; 2023 Mar; 158():57-65. PubMed ID: 36640669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carbon footprint of different recovery options for the repulping reject from liquid packaging board waste treatment process.
Khan MMH; Laitinen V; Havukainen J; Horttanainen M
Waste Manag; 2021 Dec; 136():93-103. PubMed ID: 34653854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Environmental impacts and benefits of state-of-the-art technologies for E-waste management.
Ikhlayel M
Waste Manag; 2017 Oct; 68():458-474. PubMed ID: 28662843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Global warming potential of typical rural domestic waste treatment modes in China: a case study in Ankang.
Guo H; Nie X; Shu T; Li X; Bai B
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Sep; 28(34):47149-47161. PubMed ID: 33890212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of solid digestate processing on carbon emission of an industrial-scale food waste co-digestion plant.
Zeng Q; Zhen S; Liu J; Ni Z; Chen J; Liu Z; Qi C
Bioresour Technol; 2022 Sep; 360():127639. PubMed ID: 35853594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
