These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33360756)

  • 1. Post-capture processes contribute to statistical learning of distractor locations in visual search.
    Sauter M; Hanning NM; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    Cortex; 2021 Feb; 135():108-126. PubMed ID: 33360756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical Learning of Frequent Distractor Locations in Visual Search Involves Regional Signal Suppression in Early Visual Cortex.
    Zhang B; Weidner R; Allenmark F; Bertleff S; Fink GR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2022 Jun; 32(13):2729-2744. PubMed ID: 34727169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction.
    Goschy H; Bakos S; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1195. PubMed ID: 25414676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning to suppress salient distractors in the target dimension: Region-based inhibition is persistent and transfers to distractors in a nontarget dimension.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2080-2097. PubMed ID: 30688477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
    Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systemic effects of selection history on learned ignoring.
    Kim A; Anderson B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1347-1354. PubMed ID: 35112310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative contributions of oculomotor capture and disengagement to distractor-related dwell times in visual search.
    Stefani M; Sauter M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):16676. PubMed ID: 37794059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term (statistically learnt) and short-term (inter-trial) distractor-location effects arise at different pre- and post-selective processing stages.
    Qiu N; Zhang B; Allenmark F; Nasemann J; Tsai SY; Müller HJ; Shi Z
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Oct; 60(10):e14351. PubMed ID: 37277926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical regularities bias overt attention.
    Wang B; Samara I; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1813-1821. PubMed ID: 30919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distractor suppression leads to reduced flanker interference.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):624-636. PubMed ID: 33269439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning to suppress likely distractor locations in visual search is driven by the local distractor frequency.
    Allenmark F; Zhang B; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1250-1278. PubMed ID: 36107665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trial-by-trial adjustments of top-down set modulate oculomotor capture.
    Moher J; Abrams J; Egeth HE; Yantis S; Stuphorn V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 21691926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A saliency-specific and dimension-independent mechanism of distractor suppression.
    Gong D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):292-307. PubMed ID: 33025466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Little engagement of attention by salient distractors defined in a different dimension or modality to the visual search target.
    Tsai SY; Nasemann J; Qiu N; Töllner T; Müller HJ; Shi Z
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Dec; 60(12):e14375. PubMed ID: 37417320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.