These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33360961)

  • 1. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention: Evidence for independent sources of bias.
    Kim H; Anderson BA
    Cognition; 2021 Mar; 208():104554. PubMed ID: 33360961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention II: Evidence from within-domain additivity.
    Ogden A; Kim H; Anderson BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 36536205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search.
    Le Pelley ME; Ung R; Mine C; Most SB; Watson P; Pearson D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1446-1459. PubMed ID: 35013993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Winners and losers: Reward and punishment produce biases in temporal selection.
    Le Pelley ME; Watson P; Pearson D; Abeywickrama RS; Most SB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):822-833. PubMed ID: 29985032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systemic effects of selection history on learned ignoring.
    Kim A; Anderson B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1347-1354. PubMed ID: 35112310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pavlovian reward learning underlies value driven attentional capture.
    Bucker B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):415-428. PubMed ID: 27905069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical learning of distractor shape modulates attentional capture.
    Kim H; Ogden A; Anderson BA
    Vision Res; 2023 Jan; 202():108155. PubMed ID: 36417810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection.
    MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distractors associated with reward break through the focus of attention.
    Munneke J; Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2213-25. PubMed ID: 26932872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluative distractors modulate attentional disengagement: People would rather stay longer on rewards.
    Yan M; Li Q; Long Q; Xu L; Hu N; Chen A
    J Vis; 2022 Jul; 22(8):12. PubMed ID: 35848902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression.
    Jagini KK; Sunny MM
    Cortex; 2023 Apr; 161():77-92. PubMed ID: 36913824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli.
    Le Pelley ME; Seabrooke T; Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1628-1642. PubMed ID: 28584955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional capture by Pavlovian reward-signalling distractors in visual search persists when rewards are removed.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Most SB; Theeuwes J; Wiers RW; Le Pelley ME
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226284. PubMed ID: 31830126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A saliency-specific and dimension-independent mechanism of distractor suppression.
    Gong D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):292-307. PubMed ID: 33025466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motivated suppression of value- and threat-modulated attentional capture.
    Grégoire L; Britton MK; Anderson BA
    Emotion; 2022 Jun; 22(4):780-794. PubMed ID: 32628035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
    van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimuli that signal the availability of reward break into attentional focus.
    Wang L; Li S; Zhou X; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2018 Mar; 144():20-28. PubMed ID: 29408161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture.
    Anderson BA; Laurent PA; Yantis S
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27926. PubMed ID: 22132170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.
    Lin R; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33078381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.