These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33361103)

  • 1. Methodological standards for qualitative and mixed methods patient centered outcomes research.
    Gaglio B; Henton M; Barbeau A; Evans E; Hickam D; Newhouse R; Zickmund S
    BMJ; 2020 Dec; 371():m4435. PubMed ID: 33361103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Putting patients at the heart of health-care research.
    Calvert M; Kyte D; von Hildebrand M; King M; Moher D
    Lancet; 2015 Mar; 385(9973):1073-4. PubMed ID: 25797557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles.
    Wisdom JP; Cavaleri MA; Onwuegbuzie AJ; Green CA
    Health Serv Res; 2012 Apr; 47(2):721-45. PubMed ID: 22092040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Qualitative Research in Health Services Research - Discussion Paper, Part 3: Quality of Qualitative Research].
    Stamer M; Güthlin C; Holmberg C; Karbach U; Patzelt C; Meyer T;
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Dec; 77(12):966-75. PubMed ID: 26714312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Qualitative research in health services research - discussion paper, Part 1: What is the idea?].
    Meyer T; Karbach U; Holmberg C; Güthlin C; Patzelt C; Stamer M;
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):510-5. PubMed ID: 22941738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Qualitative research in health services research - discussion paper, Part 2: Qualitative research in health services research in Germany - an overview].
    Karbach U; Stamer M; Holmberg C; Güthlin C; Patzelt C; Meyer T;
    Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):516-25. PubMed ID: 22941739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two sets of qualitative research reporting guidelines: An analysis of the shortfalls.
    King O
    Res Nurs Health; 2021 Aug; 44(4):715-723. PubMed ID: 34018217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Participatory action research, mixed methods, and research teams: learning from philosophically juxtaposed methodologies for optimal research outcomes.
    Sendall MC; McCosker LK; Brodie A; Hill M; Crane P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):167. PubMed ID: 30541471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quality control and assessment of qualitative interview in health care research].
    Xie YM; Liao X
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Jul; 6(7):668-73. PubMed ID: 18601845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beyond exploratory: a tailored framework for designing and assessing qualitative health research.
    Rendle KA; Abramson CM; Garrett SB; Halley MC; Dohan D
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e030123. PubMed ID: 31462482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reading qualitative research from a methodological point of view.
    Cuevas NM; Dinero TE; Feit MD
    J Health Soc Policy; 1996; 8(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 10162906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Qualitative research within trials: developing a standard operating procedure for a clinical trials unit.
    Rapport F; Storey M; Porter A; Snooks H; Jones K; Peconi J; Sánchez A; Siebert S; Thorne K; Clement C; Russell I
    Trials; 2013 Feb; 14():54. PubMed ID: 23433341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrating qualitative and quantitative components in evaluation of case management.
    Willenbring ML
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1992; 127():223-50. PubMed ID: 1435997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reflexivity in Qualitative Research.
    Dodgson JE
    J Hum Lact; 2019 May; 35(2):220-222. PubMed ID: 30849272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical appraisal tools for assessing the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies included in systematic mixed studies reviews.
    Pluye P
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):722. PubMed ID: 23279088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-centered research: through the looking glass in search of a paradigm.
    Noble J
    J Gen Intern Med; 1989; 4(6):555-7. PubMed ID: 2585166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guiding development of pilot projects to drive quality improvement.
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2015 Jul; 76(7):e903. PubMed ID: 26231023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?
    Barbour RS
    BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7294):1115-7. PubMed ID: 11337448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The EQUATOR Network: promoting the transparent and accurate reporting of research.
    Morris C
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2008 Oct; 50(10):723. PubMed ID: 18834380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aggregation of qualitative studies--From theory to practice: Patient priorities and family medicine/general practice evaluations.
    Reis S; Hermoni D; Van-Raalte R; Dahan R; Borkan JM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Feb; 65(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 17010557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.