These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3336197)
1. The second Baby Doe rule. Kopelman LM JAMA; 1988 Feb; 259(6):843-4. PubMed ID: 3336197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The 'Baby Doe' rule. Stevenson DK; Ariagno RL; Kutner JS; Raffin TA; Young EW JAMA; 1986 Apr; 255(14):1909-12. PubMed ID: 3951118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Baby Doe redux: doctors as child abusers. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 6643033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe. Paige C; Karnofsky EB J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 3745839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The real challenge of "Baby Doe": considering the sanctity and quality of life. Goldworth A; Stevenson DK Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1989 Mar; 28(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 2920487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A neonatologist looks at the baby Doe Rule: ethical decisions by edict. Berseth CL Pediatrics; 1983 Sep; 72(3):428-9. PubMed ID: 6889050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse. Rhoden NK; Arras JD Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(1):18-51. PubMed ID: 3158840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Checkmating the Baby Doe regulations. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Aug; 16(4):29-31. PubMed ID: 3744798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment. Britton JR West J Med; 1984 Feb; 140(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6730486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants. Brown LD J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):231-54. PubMed ID: 3745838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reporting the case of Baby Jane Doe. Kerr K Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Aug; 14(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 6237076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn. Horan DJ; Balch BJ Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Baby Doe: nothing to fear but fear itself. Barnett TJ J Perinatol; 1990 Sep; 10(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 2145405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Baby Doe, Congress and the states: challenging the federal treatment standard for impaired infants. Newman SA Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 2764010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Baby Jane Doe's right of privacy from cradle to grave: infirmities of the 1984 Child Abuse Amendment. Baughman LK Med Law; 1987; 6(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 3657404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates. Gostin L Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critically ill newborns and the law. The American experience. Merrick JC J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):189-209. PubMed ID: 7636402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical decision-making for defective infants by the Federal government. Taub S Conn Med; 1983 Jul; 47(7):413-6. PubMed ID: 6224633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Confusion over the language of the Baby Doe regulations. Bermel J Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec; 16(6):2. PubMed ID: 11643944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]