210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33364422)
21. CT radiomics for differentiating fat poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dehghani Firouzabadi F; Gopal N; Hasani A; Homayounieh F; Li X; Jones EC; Yazdian Anari P; Turkbey E; Malayeri AA
PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0287299. PubMed ID: 37498830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitative computer-aided diagnostic algorithm for automated detection of peak lesion attenuation in differentiating clear cell from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and fat-poor angiomyolipoma on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography.
Coy H; Young JR; Douek ML; Brown MS; Sayre J; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1919-1928. PubMed ID: 28280876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Predominantly Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted Images: Differentiation of Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park JJ; Kim CK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 27824487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of Iodine Concentration in the Lipid-Poor Portion of the Renal Mass for Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Sun J; Zhang XY; Li XT; Li YL; Wang ZL
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2019 May; 34(4):224-230. PubMed ID: 31070481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Differentiation of Predominantly Solid Enhancing Lipid-Poor Renal Cell Masses by Use of Contrast-Enhanced CT: Evaluating the Role of Texture in Tumor Subtyping.
Varghese BA; Chen F; Hwang DH; Cen SY; Desai B; Gill IS; Duddalwar VA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):W288-W296. PubMed ID: 30240299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat from homogeneous clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Nie P; Yang G; Wang Z; Yan L; Miao W; Hao D; Wu J; Zhao Y; Gong A; Cui J; Jia Y; Niu H
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1274-1284. PubMed ID: 31506816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Morphologic analysis with computed tomography may help differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study with 602 patients.
Kim YH; Han K; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Park SY
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Mar; 43(3):647-654. PubMed ID: 28677004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. CT negative attenuation pixel distribution and texture analysis for detection of fat in small angiomyolipoma on unenhanced CT.
Takahashi N; Takeuchi M; Sasaguri K; Leng S; Froemming A; Kawashima A
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jun; 41(6):1142-51. PubMed ID: 27015866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tumoral vascular pattern in renal cell carcinoma and fat-poor renal angiomyolipoma as a novel helpful differentiating factor on contrast-enhanced CT scan.
Bagheri SM; Khajehasani F; Fatemi I; Ayoubpour MR
Tumour Biol; 2017 Oct; 39(10):1010428317733144. PubMed ID: 28990498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radiomics of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in renal cell carcinoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ursprung S; Beer L; Bruining A; Woitek R; Stewart GD; Gallagher FA; Sala E
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3558-3566. PubMed ID: 32060715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intensity ratio curve analysis of small renal masses on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Moriyama S; Yoshida S; Tanaka H; Tanaka H; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Saito K; Kihara K; Fujii Y
Int J Urol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):554-560. PubMed ID: 29577440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Renal cell carcinoma containing macroscopic fat on CT mimics an angiomyolipoma due to bone metaplasia without macroscopic calcification.
Richmond L; Atri M; Sherman C; Sharir S
Br J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 83(992):e179-81. PubMed ID: 20647509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Differentiation of renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat from small clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using specific region of interest on contrast-enhanced CT: a new combination of quantitative tools.
Wang X; Song G; Jiang H
Cancer Imaging; 2021 Jul; 21(1):47. PubMed ID: 34225784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Renal angiomyolipoma: preoperative identification of atypical fat-poor AML.
Farrell C; Noyes SL; Tourojman M; Lane BR
Curr Urol Rep; 2015 Mar; 16(3):12. PubMed ID: 25677233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Usefulness of CT texture analysis in differentiating benign and malignant renal tumours.
Deng Y; Soule E; Cui E; Samuel A; Shah S; Lall C; Sundaram C; Sandrasegaran K
Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):108-115. PubMed ID: 31668402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sonographic Features of Small (< 4 cm) Renal Tumors With Low Signal Intensity on T2-Weighted MR Images: Differentiating Minimal-Fat Angiomyolipoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Cho KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 30040467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Point Shear Wave Elastography Using Machine Learning to Differentiate Renal Cell Carcinoma and Angiomyolipoma.
Sagreiya H; Akhbardeh A; Li D; Sigrist R; Chung BI; Sonn GA; Tian L; Rubin DL; Willmann JK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1944-1954. PubMed ID: 31133445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Differentiation between fat-poor angiomyolipoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: qualitative and quantitative analysis using arterial spin labeling MR imaging.
Ye J; Xu Q; Wang SA; Zheng J; Zhu QQ; Dou WQ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Feb; 45(2):512-519. PubMed ID: 31705246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
