These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33364678)

  • 1. Behavioral Validation of the Smartphone for Remote Microphone Technology.
    Tittle S; Thibodeau LM; Panahi I; Tokgoz S; Shankar N; Bhat GS; Patel K
    Semin Hear; 2020 Nov; 41(4):291-301. PubMed ID: 33364678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Benefit of Remote Microphones Using Four Wireless Protocols.
    Rodemerk KS; Galster JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):724-731. PubMed ID: 26333880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Wireless Remote Microphone on Speech Recognition in Noise for Hearing Aid Users in China.
    Chen J; Wang Z; Dong R; Fu X; Wang Y; Wang S
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():643205. PubMed ID: 33912004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits in Speech Recognition in Noise with Remote Wireless Microphones in Group Settings.
    Thibodeau LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):404-411. PubMed ID: 31758679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smartphone-Connected Hearing Aids Enable and Empower Self-Management of Hearing Loss: A Qualitative Interview Study Underpinned by the Behavior Change Wheel.
    Gomez R; Habib A; Maidment DW; Ferguson MA
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):921-932. PubMed ID: 34653030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effects of FM and Hearing Aid Microphone Settings, FM Gain, and Ambient Noise Levels on SNR at the Tympanic Membrane.
    Norrix LW; Camarota K; Harris FP; Dean J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 26905531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual Differences Offer Insight Into Clinical Recommendations for Directional and Remote Microphone Technology Use in Children.
    Gustafson SJ; Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):635-650. PubMed ID: 33465321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech Recognition in Noise in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology.
    Wesarg T; Arndt S; Wiebe K; Schmid F; Huber A; Mülder HE; Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Speck I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):607-618. PubMed ID: 30430986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Potential Benefits and Limitations of Noise-Management Technologies for Children with Hearing Aids.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Browning S; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Feb; 33(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 35512843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. .Signal Transparency of Remote Microphone Technology in Pediatric Bone Conduction Device Users.
    Sanchez C; Morgenstein K; Snapp H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(5):360-370. PubMed ID: 37271142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of speech recognition with adaptive digital and FM remote microphone hearing assistance technology by listeners who use hearing aids.
    Thibodeau L
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 23(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 24699929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The effects of wireless audio microphones on sentences recognition threshold for hearing aid users in noise].
    Chen J; Dong RJ; Liu DX; Wang Y; Wang S
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 33(10):951-953. PubMed ID: 31623041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Desjardins JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. French Version of the Antiphasic Digits-in-Noise Test for Smartphone Hearing Screening.
    Ceccato JC; Duran MJ; Swanepoel W; Smits C; De Sousa KC; Gledhill L; Venail F; Puel JL
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():725080. PubMed ID: 34722438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.