These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. A balancing act. How to juggle pharmacy costs and quality care. Gong J; Webster T Contemp Longterm Care; 1999 May; 22(5):suppl 17-8. PubMed ID: 10537396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective payment for capital costs: incentive for good management. Zuckerman A; Dix L Hosp Purch Manage; 1986 Feb; 11(2):3-6. PubMed ID: 10275477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Medicare program; prospective payment system and consolidated billing for skilled nursing facilities for FY 2009. Final rule. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS Fed Regist; 2008 Aug; 73(154):46415-62. PubMed ID: 18949883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nursing staff systems. Gearing care to patient needs. McNally JK Cost Containment; 1979 Oct; 1(19):3-5. PubMed ID: 10244119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective payment (DRGs): what will be the impact on cancer care? Yasko JM; Fleck A Oncol Nurs Forum; 1984; 11(3):63-72. PubMed ID: 6425810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Redistribution of revenues under a prototypical prospective payment system: characteristics of winners and losers. Short T; Goldfarb MG J Policy Anal Manage; 1987; 6(3):385-401. PubMed ID: 10301882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Measuring variations in nursing care per DRG. Ballard KA; Gray RF; Knauf RA; Uppal P Nurs Manage; 1993 Apr; 24(4):33-6, 40-1. PubMed ID: 8474748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The key to balancing costs and care under PPS: get back to the basics. Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Jan; 8(1):6. PubMed ID: 10788000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Prospective payment in medical rehabilitation]. Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2003 Jun; 42(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 12813650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does competition under Medicare Prospective Payment selectively reduce expenditures on high-cost patients? Meltzer D; Chung J; Basu A Rand J Econ; 2002; 33(3):447-68. PubMed ID: 12585302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prospective payment: focus on clinical nursing research. Jacox AK ANA Publ; 1984 Apr; (G-164):40-50. PubMed ID: 6563866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. How to reduce nursing costs without adversely affecting quality. Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Jan; 8(2):5-7. PubMed ID: 10788158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [NANDA, NIC and NOC on the road to a single concept. Professional innovation or a clash of interests?]. Regeer L TVZ; 1998 Jan; 108(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 9526438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [DRGs; its entity and effect on nursing]. Kim KJ; Kim YS Taehan Kanho; 1986 Jun; 25(2):40-8. PubMed ID: 3090347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Surviving the Interim Payment System. Stewart M Home Care Manag; 1998; 2(4):29-30. PubMed ID: 10409942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A decade of Medicare's prospective payment system--success or failure? Altman SH; Young DA J Am Health Policy; 1993; 3(2):11-9. PubMed ID: 10126973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Testing the alternatives: steps in the development of prospective payment for home care. Hoyer R Caring; 1988 Feb; 7(2):6, 9. PubMed ID: 10302278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]