These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3336693)

  • 21. Compliance with referrals from a cancer-screening project.
    Lane DS
    J Fam Pract; 1983 Nov; 17(5):811-7. PubMed ID: 6631345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correlates of screening mammography in a family practice setting.
    Bourguet CC; Gilchrist VJ; Kandula M
    J Fam Pract; 1988 Jul; 27(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 3392509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands.
    Klompenhouwer EG; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; de Haan AF; Wauters CA; Broeders MJ; Duijm LE
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 25573788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Communication of mammography results to women by radiologists: attitudes of referring health care providers.
    Bassett LW; Bomyea K; Liu S; Sayre J
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):235-8. PubMed ID: 7892477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
    Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Screening mammography referral rates for women ages 50 to 69 years by recently-licensed family physicians: physician and practice environment correlates.
    Haggerty J; Tamblyn R; Abrahamowicz M; Beaulieu MD; Kishchuk N
    Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 29(5):391-404. PubMed ID: 10564631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Variation in screening mammography and Papanicolaou smear by primary care physician specialty and gatekeeper plan (United States).
    Haggstrom DA; Phillips KA; Liang SY; Haas JS; Tye S; Kerlikowske K
    Cancer Causes Control; 2004 Nov; 15(9):883-92. PubMed ID: 15577290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Women's attitudes toward screening mammography.
    Glockner SM; Holden MG; Hilton SV; Norcross WA
    Am J Prev Med; 1992; 8(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 1599723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Medicolegal aspects of breast imaging: variable standards of care relating to different types of practice.
    Brenner RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Apr; 156(4):719-23. PubMed ID: 2003433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implementation of breast cancer screening.
    Pisano ED; McLelland R
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):579-87. PubMed ID: 1909543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computerized follow-up of abnormalities detected at mammography screening.
    Monticciolo DL; Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Oct; 155(4):751-3. PubMed ID: 2119104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of low-cost mammography screening on nearby mammography practices.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 3380983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Utilization of screening mammography: comparison of different physician specialties.
    Mann LC; Hawes DR; Ghods M; Bednar EJ; Potchen EJ
    Radiology; 1987 Jul; 164(1):121-2. PubMed ID: 3588897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of referring physician specialty and practice type on referral for image-guided breast biopsy.
    Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Gareen IF
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 17411865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Breast cancer screening: the underuse of mammography.
    Fox S; Baum JK; Klos DS; Tsou CV
    Radiology; 1985 Sep; 156(3):607-11. PubMed ID: 4023217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physician recommendations for screening mammography: results of a survey using clinical vignettes.
    Hamblin JE
    J Fam Pract; 1991 May; 32(5):472-7. PubMed ID: 2022935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Breast cancer screening. Changing physician practices and specialty variation.
    Lane DS; Burg MA
    N Y State J Med; 1990 Jun; 90(6):288-92. PubMed ID: 2370984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of direct referrals on time to diagnosis after an abnormal breast screening result.
    Decker KM; Harrison M; Chateau D
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2004; 28(5):361-7. PubMed ID: 15542262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Maximizing Value Through Innovations in Radiologist-Driven Communications in Breast Imaging.
    Lee CI; Lee JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1001-1005. PubMed ID: 28726506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.