These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3336712)

  • 1. Inferior vena cava filters: in vitro comparison of clot trapping and flow dynamics.
    Katsamouris AA; Waltman AC; Delichatsios MA; Athanasoulis CA
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 3336712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of clinically available inferior vena cava filters with an in vitro physiologic simulation of the vena cava.
    Simon M; Rabkin DJ; Kleshinski S; Kim D; Ransil BJ
    Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 8234702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low-artifact intravascular devices: MR imaging evaluation.
    Teitelbaum GP; Ortega HV; Vinitski S; Stern H; Tsuruda JS; Mitchell DG; Rifkin MD; Bradley WG
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 3406402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of caval filters.
    Robinson JD; Madison MT; Hunter DW; Castaneda-Zuniga WR; Amplatz K
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1988 Dec; 11(6):346-51. PubMed ID: 3145810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro and in vivo experimental evaluation of a new vena caval filter.
    Qian Z; Yasui K; Nazarian GK; Vlodaver Z; Hunter DW; Castaneda-Zuniga WR; Amplatz K
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8054757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro evaluation of vena cava filters.
    Hammer FD; Rousseau HP; Joffre FG; Sentenac BP; Tran-Van T; Barthelemy RP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(6):869-76. PubMed ID: 7873867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inferior vena cava filters. Indications, safety, effectiveness.
    Becker DM; Philbrick JT; Selby JB
    Arch Intern Med; 1992 Oct; 152(10):1985-94. PubMed ID: 1417371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental comparison of percutaneous vena caval devices: titanium Greenfield filter versus bird's nest filter.
    Burke PE; Michna BA; Harvey CF; Crute SL; Sobel M; Greenfield LJ
    J Vasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 6(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 3599283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of filters in an oversized vena caval phantom: intracaval placement of a bird's nest filter versus biiliac placement of Greenfield, Vena Tech-LGM, and Simon nitinol filters.
    Korbin CD; Reed RA; Taylor FC; Pentecost MJ; Teitelbaum GP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Aug; 3(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1515730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporary inferior vena cava filters: in vitro comparison with permanent IVC filters.
    Stoneham GW; Burbridge BE; Millward SF
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 8541676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative in vitro evaluation of the nitinol inferior vena cava filter.
    Palestrant AM; Prince M; Simon M
    Radiology; 1982 Nov; 145(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7134434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vena cava filter performance based on hemodynamics and reported thrombosis and pulmonary embolism patterns.
    Harlal A; Ojha M; Johnston KW
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Jan; 18(1 Pt 1):103-15. PubMed ID: 17296710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The diameter of the inferior vena cava and its implications for the use of vena caval filters.
    Prince MR; Novelline RA; Athanasoulis CA; Simon M
    Radiology; 1983 Dec; 149(3):687-9. PubMed ID: 6647844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interruption of the inferior vena cava for prevention of pulmonary embolism: transvenous filter devices.
    Grassi CJ; Goldhaber SZ
    Herz; 1989 Jun; 14(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 2661387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro evaluation of optionally retrievable and permanent IVC filters.
    Mahnken AH; Pfeffer J; Stanzel S; Mossdorf A; Günther RW; Schmitz-Rode T
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Jul; 42(7):529-35. PubMed ID: 17568276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical points on transvenous insertion of inferior vena cava filters.
    Novelline RA
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1980; 3(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 7459925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical analysis of the hemodynamics and embolus capture of a greenfield vena cava filter.
    Swaminathan TN; Hu HH; Patel AA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 16706585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Partial interruption of the inferior vena cava using a percutaneous endovenous filter].
    Babuty D; Quilliet L; Charbonnier B; Lang M; Mycinski C; Desveaux B
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1990 Aug; 83(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 2122856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel deployment design of vena cava filters might be the solution to their blockage problem.
    Chen Z; Fan Y; Deng X
    Med Hypotheses; 2011 Dec; 77(6):990-2. PubMed ID: 21903340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro study of guide wire entrapment in currently available inferior vena cava filters.
    Stavropoulos SW; Itkin M; Trerotola SO
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Jul; 14(7):905-10. PubMed ID: 12847198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.