77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3336720)
1. Lung lesions: correlation between viewing time and detection.
Oestmann JW; Greene R; Kushner DC; Bourgouin PM; Linetsky L; Llewellyn HJ
Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):451-3. PubMed ID: 3336720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chest "gestalt" and detectability of lung lesions.
Oestmann JW; Greene R; Bourgouin PM; Linetsky L; Llewellyn HJ
Eur J Radiol; 1993 Feb; 16(2):154-7. PubMed ID: 8462582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subtle lung cancers: impact of edge enhancement and gray scale reversal on detection with digitized chest radiographs.
Oestmann JW; Kushner DC; Bourgouin PM; Llewellyn HJ; Mockbee BW; Greene R
Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):657-8. PubMed ID: 3363122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive value and threshold detectability of lung tumors.
Kundel HL
Radiology; 1981 Apr; 139(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 7208937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interpretation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities: conventional versus film-digitized radiography.
Kido S; Ikezoe J; Takeuchi N; Kondoh H; Johkoh T; Kohno N; Tomiyama N; Yamagami H; Naito H; Arisawa J
Radiology; 1994 Jul; 192(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 8208932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging systems evaluation: effect of subtle cases on the design and analysis of receiver operating characteristic studies.
Rockette HE; King JL; Medina JL; Eisen HB; Brown ML; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 7645495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Searching for lung nodules. Visual dwell indicates locations of false-positive and false-negative decisions.
Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Krupinski EA
Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 2521130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sequential viewing of abdominal CT images at varying rates.
Gur D; Good WF; Oliver JH; Thaete FL; Baron RL; Federle MP; Campbell WL; Rosenthal MS
Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 8134556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of feature size abnormalities using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Warren RC; Darwin CJ
Br J Radiol; 1989 Sep; 62(741):817-23. PubMed ID: 2790422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search.
Kundel HL; Nodine CF
Radiology; 1975 Sep; 116(3):527-32. PubMed ID: 125436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Sickles EA
Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):581-9. PubMed ID: 3623862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Sartoni Galloni S; Guidarelli G; Pastori R
Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of search time on perception.
Christensen EE; Murry RC; Holland K; Reynolds J; Landay MJ; Moore JG
Radiology; 1981 Feb; 138(2):361-5. PubMed ID: 7455116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of film density on the radiologic detection of lung lesions.
Kundel HL; Revesz G
Invest Radiol; 1977; 12(2):199-200. PubMed ID: 856761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules. Assessment with digitized conventional radiographs.
Foley WD; Wilson CR; Keyes GS; DiBianca FA; Scanlon GT; Schleuter D; Lawson TL
Radiology; 1981 Oct; 141(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 7291538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The value of serum Cyfra21-1 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
Cui C; Sun X; Zhang J; Han D; Gu J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014 Nov; 10 Suppl():C131-4. PubMed ID: 25450270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of subtle microcalcifications: comparison of computed radiography and screen-film mammography.
Higashida Y; Moribe N; Morita K; Katsuda N; Hatemura M; Takada T; Takahashi M; Yamashita J
Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):483-6. PubMed ID: 1561354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of kilovoltage on diagnostic accuracy in chest radiography.
Revesz G; Shea FJ; Kundel HL
Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):615-8. PubMed ID: 7063674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
