137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33368345)
1. Impact of air gap, range shifter, and delivery technique on skin dose in proton therapy.
Kern A; Bäumer C; Kröninger K; Wulff J; Timmermann B
Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 48(2):831-840. PubMed ID: 33368345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurements of in-air spot size of pencil proton beam for various air gaps in conjunction with a range shifter on a ProteusPLUS PBS dedicated machine and comparison to the proton dose calculation algorithms.
Rana S; Samuel EJJ
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 42(3):853-862. PubMed ID: 31222565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design and commissioning of the non-dedicated scanning proton beamline for ocular treatment at the synchrotron-based CNAO facility.
Ciocca M; Magro G; Mastella E; Mairani A; Mirandola A; Molinelli S; Russo S; Vai A; Fiore MR; Mosci C; Valvo F; Via R; Baroni G; Orecchia R
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1852-1862. PubMed ID: 30659616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using field size factors to characterize the in-air fluence of a proton machine with a range shifter.
Shen J; Lentz JM; Hu Y; Liu W; Morales DH; Stoker JB; Bues M
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Mar; 12(1):52. PubMed ID: 28288673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvements in pencil beam scanning proton therapy dose calculation accuracy in brain tumor cases with a commercial Monte Carlo algorithm.
Widesott L; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Farace P; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145016. PubMed ID: 29726402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurements of lateral penumbra for uniform scanning proton beams under various beam delivery conditions and comparison to the XiO treatment planning system.
Rana S; Zeidan O; Ramirez E; Rains M; Gao J; Zheng Y
Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):091708. PubMed ID: 24007141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual ring multilayer ionization chamber and theory-based correction technique for scanning proton therapy.
Takayanagi T; Nihongi H; Nishiuchi H; Tadokoro M; Ito Y; Nakashima C; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Matsuda K; Sakae T; Terunuma T
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4150. PubMed ID: 27370135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization and validation of a Monte Carlo code for independent dose calculation in proton therapy treatments with pencil beam scanning.
Fracchiolla F; Lorentini S; Widesott L; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):8601-19. PubMed ID: 26501569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extended in-field and out-of-field validation of a compact Monte Carlo model of an IBA PROTEUS
Colson D; Blommaert J; Poels K; De Saint-Hubert M; Reniers B; Depuydt T
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(21):. PubMed ID: 37844576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo investigation of collimator scatter of proton-therapy beams produced using the passive scattering method.
Titt U; Zheng Y; Vassiliev ON; Newhauser WD
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):487-504. PubMed ID: 18185001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy.
Testa M; Schümann J; Lu HM; Shin J; Faddegon B; Perl J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121719. PubMed ID: 24320505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Monte Carlo study on the collimation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy beams.
Charlwood FC; Aitkenhead AH; Mackay RI
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1462-72. PubMed ID: 26936730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PETRA: A pencil beam trimming algorithm for analytical proton therapy dose calculations with the dynamic collimation system.
Bennett LC; Hyer DE; Erhart K; Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Smith BR; Hill PM; Flynn RT
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7263-7280. PubMed ID: 37370239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technical Note: Simulation of dose buildup in proton pencil beams.
Kelleter L; Zhen-Hong Tham B; Saakyan R; Griffiths J; Amos R; Jolly S; Gibson A
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3734-3738. PubMed ID: 31206725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system.
Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Lii M; Sawakuchi GO; Titt U; Bues M; Song X; Zhang X; Li Y; Ciangaru G; Li H; Taylor MB; Suzuki K; Mohan R; Gillin MT; Sahoo N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041723. PubMed ID: 23556893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of planar proton minibeam radiation therapy using a pencil beam scanning system: A proof of concept study.
De Marzi L; Patriarca A; Nauraye C; Hierso E; Dendale R; Guardiola C; Prezado Y
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5305-5316. PubMed ID: 30311639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine.
Kugel F; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Janson M; Kretschmer J; Brodbek L; Behrends C; Verbeek N; Looe HK; Poppe B; Timmermann B
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):529-541. PubMed ID: 36577626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
