These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Conspecific and heterospecific information use in bumblebees. Dawson EH; Chittka L PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31444. PubMed ID: 22347479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sniffing out the competition? Juvenile coral reef damselfishes use chemical cues to distinguish the presence of conspecific and heterospecific aggregations. Coppock AG; Gardiner NM; Jones GP Behav Processes; 2016 Apr; 125():43-50. PubMed ID: 26855382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High temperatures result in smaller nurseries which lower reproduction of pollinators and parasites in a brood site pollination mutualism. Krishnan A; Pramanik GK; Revadi SV; Venkateswaran V; Borges RM PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115118. PubMed ID: 25521512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nest site preference depends on the relative density of conspecifics and heterospecifics in wild birds. Samplonius JM; Kromhout Van Der Meer IM; Both C Front Zool; 2017; 14():56. PubMed ID: 29270207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Highlighting Potential Physical and Chemical Cues Involved in Conspecific Recognition System in a Predator Nematode, Seinura caverna. Ekino T; Yoshiga T; Takeuchi-Kaneko Y; Ichihara Y; Kanzaki N; Shinya R Integr Comp Biol; 2023 Oct; 63(4):865-876. PubMed ID: 37500258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Symbiosis of the millipede parasitic nematodes Rhigonematoidea and Thelastomatoidea with evolutionary different origins. Nagae S; Sato K; Tanabe T; Hasegawa K BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Jun; 21(1):120. PubMed ID: 34118872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. No evidence of flowering synchronization upon floral volatiles for a short lived annual plant species: revisiting an appealing hypothesis. Fricke U; Lucas-Barbosa D; Douma JC BMC Ecol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 31391049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice. Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Character displacement and the evolution of mate choice: an artificial neural network approach. Pfennig KS; Ryan MJ Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 362(1479):411-9. PubMed ID: 17255015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interactions with heterospecific males do not affect how female Mesocricetus hamsters respond to conspecific males. Delbarco-Trillo J; Johnston RE Anim Behav; 2013 Jan; 86(1):151-156. PubMed ID: 23439800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A trophic cascade induced by predatory ants in a fig-fig wasp mutualism. Wang B; Geng XZ; Ma LB; Cook JM; Wang RW J Anim Ecol; 2014 Sep; 83(5):1149-57. PubMed ID: 24666375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Plant-mediated competition facilitates a phoretic association between a gall mite and a psyllid vector. Li J; Liu S; Guo K; Zhang F; Qiao H; Chen J; Yang M; Zhu X; Xu R; Xu C; Chen J Exp Appl Acarol; 2018 Nov; 76(3):325-337. PubMed ID: 30341476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Heterospecific pollen deposition: does diversity alter the consequences? Arceo-Gómez G; Ashman TL New Phytol; 2011 Nov; 192(3):738-46. PubMed ID: 21777248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]