140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33368411)
1. A comparative study between the two patch test systems Finn chambers and Finn chambers AQUA.
Luu H; Mowitz M; Bruze M; Engfeldt M; Isaksson M; Svedman C
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 May; 84(5):290-298. PubMed ID: 33368411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patch testing with aluminium Finn Chambers could give false-positive reactions in patients with contact allergy to aluminium.
Rosholm Comstedt L; Dahlin J; Bruze M; Hedberg Y; Matura M; Svedman C
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Oct; 85(4):407-414. PubMed ID: 33896001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of IQ-ultra and Finn Chambers test methodologies in detecting 10 common standard allergens that cause allergic contact dermatitis.
Doumit J; Pratt M
J Cutan Med Surg; 2012; 16(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 22417991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of aluminium release from Finn chambers under different in vitro test conditions of relevance for patch testing.
Hedberg YS; Wei Z; Matura M
Contact Dermatitis; 2020 Nov; 83(5):380-386. PubMed ID: 32484247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Routine diagnostic patch-testing with formaldehyde 2.0% (0.6 mg/cm2) may be an advantage compared to 1.0%.
Hauksson I; Pontén A; Gruvberger B; Isaksson M; Bruze M
Acta Derm Venereol; 2010 Sep; 90(5):480-4. PubMed ID: 20814622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patch testing with formaldehyde 2.0% in parallel with 1.0% by the Swedish contact dermatitis research group.
Isaksson M; Bråred-Christensson J; Engfeldt M; Lindberg M; Matura M; Möller H; Ryberg K; Stenberg B; Svedman C; Bruze M;
Acta Derm Venereol; 2014 Jul; 94(4):408-10. PubMed ID: 24337098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new occlusive patch test system comparable to IQ and Finn chambers.
Sajun Merchant SZ; Vaidya AD; Salvi A; Joshi RS; Mohile RB
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2014; 80(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 25035351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recommendation to include formaldehyde 2.0% aqua in the European baseline patch test series.
Pontén A; Goossens A; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Dec; 69(6):372-4. PubMed ID: 24117773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of Finn Chambers and T.R.U.E. test methodologies in detecting the relevant allergens inducing contact dermatitis.
Suneja T; Belsito DV
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Dec; 45(6):836-9. PubMed ID: 11712026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patch testing with methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 200 ppm aq. detects significantly more contact allergy than 100 ppm. A multicentre study within the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Bruze M; Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Andersen KE; Gonçalo M; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Maibach HI; Rustemeyer T; Le Coz CJ; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Jul; 71(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 24712418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The significance of batch and patch test method in establishing contact allergy to fragrance mix I-EDEN Fragrance Study Group.
Bruze M; Mowitz M; Ofenloch R; Coenraads PJ; Diepgen TL; Elsner P; Gonçalo M; Naldi L; Svensson Å
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Aug; 81(2):104-109. PubMed ID: 30810228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patch testing with purified and oxidized citronellol.
Hagvall L; Rudbäck J; Bråred Christensson J; Karlberg AT
Contact Dermatitis; 2020 Nov; 83(5):372-379. PubMed ID: 32638395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recommendation to increase the test concentration of methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone in the European baseline patch test series - on behalf of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis and the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Bruze M; Goossens A; Isaksson M
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Jul; 71(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 24712382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber patch test techniques in Singapore.
Goh CL
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Aug; 27(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 1395634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vesicular Contact Reaction May Progress into Erythema Multiforme.
Czarnecka-Operacz M; Jenerowicz D; Szulczyńska-Gabor J; Teresiak-Mikołajczak E; Szyfter-Harris J; Bowszyc-Dmochowska M
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2016 Dec; 24(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 28128086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hand dermatitis in adults referred for patch testing: Analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2000 to 2016.
Silverberg JI; Warshaw EM; Atwater AR; Maibach HI; Zug KA; Reeder MJ; Sasseville D; Taylor JS; Fowler JF; Pratt MD; Fransway AF; Zirwas MJ; Belsito DV; Marks JG; DeLeo VA; DeKoven JG
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Apr; 84(4):989-999. PubMed ID: 33259878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. More positive patch test reactions with larger test chambers? Results from a study group of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
Brasch J; Szliska C; Grabbe J
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Sep; 37(3):118-20. PubMed ID: 9330817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contact allergens as allergic or irritant.
Geier J; Uter W; Pirker C; Frosch PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Feb; 48(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12694214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosage considerations in patch testing with liquid allergens.
Shaw DW; Zhai H; Maibach HI; Niklasson B
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Aug; 47(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 12423405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.
Löffler H; Freyschmidt-Paul P; Effendy I; Maibach HI
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11244137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
