These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33368411)

  • 41. Audit of Finn Chamber patch test preparation.
    Moffitt DL; Sharp LA; Sansom JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Dec; 47(6):334-6. PubMed ID: 12581278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period.
    Pratt MD; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug K
    Dermatitis; 2004 Dec; 15(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 15842061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Contact Dermatitis of the Hands: Is It Irritant or Allergic?
    Patel V; Atwater AR; Reeder M
    Cutis; 2021 Mar; 107(3):129-132. PubMed ID: 33956604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to fragrance mix.
    Devos SA; Constandt L; Tupker RA; Noz KC; Lucker GP; Bruynzeel DP; Schuttelaar ML; Kruyswijk MR; van Zuuren EJ; Vink J; Coenraads PJ; Kiemeney LA; van der Valk PG
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18346396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. 24 and 48 h allergen exposure in patch testing. Comparative study with 11 common contact allergens and NiCl2.
    Kalimo K; Lammintausta K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Jan; 10(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 6705516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of A1-test and Finn chamber test.
    Peltonen L
    Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Jul; 7(4):192-6. PubMed ID: 7326923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Two cases of contact allergic reactions to Finn Chamber AQUA test chambers.
    Hamnerius N; Mowitz M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Oct; 81(4):320-322. PubMed ID: 31119750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Multicentre patch testing with a resol resin based on phenol and formaldehyde.
    Isaksson M; Inerot A; Lidén C; Matura M; Stenberg B; Möller H; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Jul; 65(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 21595700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Is a specific eyelid patch test series useful? Results of a French prospective study.
    Assier H; Tetart F; Avenel-Audran M; Barbaud A; Ferrier-le Bouëdec MC; Giordano-Labadie F; Milpied B; Amsler E; Collet E; Girardin P; Soria A; Waton J; Truchetet F; Bourrain JL; Gener G; Bernier C; Raison-Peyron N;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2018 Sep; 79(3):157-161. PubMed ID: 29882592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II and their ingredients in southern Sweden between 2009 and 2015.
    Mowitz M; Svedman C; Zimerson E; Isaksson M; Pontén A; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Nov; 77(5):280-287. PubMed ID: 28685882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Patch testing discordance alert: false-negative findings with rubber additives and fragrances.
    Sherertz EF; Fransway AF; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Taylor JS
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Aug; 45(2):313-4. PubMed ID: 11464199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Risk factors for common contact allergens and patch test results using a modified European baseline series in patients tested during between 2000 and 2009 at Siriraj Hospital.
    Boonchai W; Iamtharachai P
    Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2014 Mar; 32(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 24641292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Finding the optimal patch test material and test concentration to detect contact allergy to geraniol.
    Hagvall L; Karlberg AT; Christensson JB
    Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Apr; 68(4):224-31. PubMed ID: 23510343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Patch-testing North American lip dermatitis patients: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001 to 2004.
    Zug KA; Kornik R; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM;
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 18674455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Establishing aluminium contact allergy.
    Siemund I; Zimerson E; Hindsén M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Sep; 67(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 22594839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Recommendation of appropriate amounts of petrolatum preparation to be applied at patch testing.
    Bruze M; Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 May; 56(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 17441852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Allergic contact dermatitis in Iran.
    Kashani MN; Gorouhi F; Behnia F; Nazemi MJ; Dowlati Y; Firooz A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Mar; 52(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 15811031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Positive concomitant test reactions to allergens in the standard patch test series.
    Landeck L; González E; Baden L; Neumann K; Schalock P
    Int J Dermatol; 2010 May; 49(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 20534085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. 'Calibration' of our patch test reading technique is necessary.
    Svedman C; Isaksson M; Björk J; Mowitz M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Apr; 66(4):180-7. PubMed ID: 22404193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.