429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33369591)
1. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A; Bartlett E
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e91-e103. PubMed ID: 26583482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Stimulus Level and Bandwidth on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Adults With Normal Hearing.
Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):619-34. PubMed ID: 26226607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Envelope frequency following responses are stronger for high-pass than low-pass filtered vowels.
Vanheusden FJ; Chesnaye MA; Simpson DM; Bell SL
Int J Audiol; 2019 Jun; 58(6):355-362. PubMed ID: 30675827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Brainstem auditory responses to resolved and unresolved harmonics of a synthetic vowel in quiet and noise.
Laroche M; Dajani HR; Prévost F; Marcoux AM
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 22814487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech: Amplitude Modulation Versus Amplitude Plus Frequency Modulation.
Suresh CH; Krishnan A; Luo X
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):300-311. PubMed ID: 31246660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of frequency compression and frequency transposition on fricative and affricate perception in listeners with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss.
Alexander JM; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz PG
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):519-32. PubMed ID: 24699702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Temporal Envelope Cutoff Frequency, Number of Channels, and Carrier Type on Brainstem Neural Representation of Pitch in Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 65(8):3146-3164. PubMed ID: 35944032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory Brainstem Representation of the Voice Pitch Contours in the Resolved and Unresolved Components of Mandarin Tones.
Peng F; McKay CM; Mao D; Hou W; Innes-Brown H
Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():820. PubMed ID: 30505262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective discrimination of bimodal speech using frequency following responses.
Xu C; Cheng FY; Medina S; Eng E; Gifford R; Smith S
Hear Res; 2023 Sep; 437():108853. PubMed ID: 37441879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.
Bidelman GM; Momtaz S
Neurosci Lett; 2021 Feb; 746():135664. PubMed ID: 33497718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating potential interactions between envelope following responses elicited simultaneously by different vowel formants.
Easwar V; Scollie S; Purcell D
Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():35-45. PubMed ID: 31176869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity of envelope following responses to vowel polarity.
Easwar V; Beamish L; Aiken S; Choi JM; Scollie S; Purcell D
Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 320():38-50. PubMed ID: 25500177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved Detection of Vowel Envelope Frequency Following Responses Using Hotelling's T2 Analysis.
Vanheusden FJ; Bell SL; Chesnaye MA; Simpson DM
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 29757799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural Envelope Processing at Low Frequencies Predicts Speech Understanding of Children With Hearing Loss in Noise and Reverberation.
Easwar V; Peng ZE; Boothalingam S; Seeto M
Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):837-849. PubMed ID: 38768048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aging degrades the neural encoding of simple and complex sounds in the human brainstem.
Clinard CG; Tremblay KL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):590-9; quiz 643-4. PubMed ID: 24047946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency-Following Response to Steady-State Vowel in Quiet and Background Noise Among Marching Band Participants With Normal Hearing.
Suresh CH; Krishnan A
Am J Audiol; 2022 Sep; 31(3):719-736. PubMed ID: 35944059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
