230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33370470)
1. Robot-assisted technique vs conventional freehand technique in spine surgery: A meta-analysis.
Fu W; Tong J; Liu G; Zheng Y; Wang S; Abdelrahim MEA; Gong S
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 May; 75(5):e13964. PubMed ID: 33370470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-assisted Technique Versus Conventional Freehand Technique in Spine Surgery From Nine Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-analysis.
Li HM; Zhang RJ; Shen CL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Jan; 45(2):E111-E119. PubMed ID: 31404053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Gao S; Lv Z; Fang H
Eur Spine J; 2018 Apr; 27(4):921-930. PubMed ID: 29032475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of robot-assisted and freehand pedicle screw placement for lumbar revision surgery.
Zhang JN; Fan Y; He X; Liu TJ; Hao DJ
Int Orthop; 2021 Jun; 45(6):1531-1538. PubMed ID: 32989559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and postoperative assessment of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws during scoliosis surgery compared with conventional freehand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cui W; Liu X; Zhao Z; Feng Z; Meng X
J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jun; 19(1):365. PubMed ID: 38902785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of robot-assisted versus conventional freehand pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Peng YN; Tsai LC; Hsu HC; Kao CH
Ann Transl Med; 2020 Jul; 8(13):824. PubMed ID: 32793669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robot-assisted and freehand pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Li Y; Wang Y; Ma X; Ma J; Dong B; Yang P; Sun Y; Zhou L; Shen J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 May; 18(1):359. PubMed ID: 37189203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pedicle screw placement accuracy in robot-assisted versus image-guided freehand surgery of thoraco-lumbar spine (ROBARTHRODESE): study protocol for a single-centre randomized controlled trial.
Aurouer N; Guerin P; Cogniet A; Gangnet N; Pedram M; Piechaud PT; ; Mangione P
Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):106. PubMed ID: 38310274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws compared to conventional free-hand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fatima N; Massaad E; Hadzipasic M; Shankar GM; Shin JH
Spine J; 2021 Feb; 21(2):181-192. PubMed ID: 32976997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of robot-guided versus freehand fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery.
Molliqaj G; Schatlo B; Alaid A; Solomiichuk V; Rohde V; Schaller K; Tessitore E
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E14. PubMed ID: 28463623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic and navigated pedicle screws are safer and more accurate than fluoroscopic freehand screws: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Matur AV; Palmisciano P; Duah HO; Chilakapati SS; Cheng JS; Adogwa O
Spine J; 2023 Feb; 23(2):197-208. PubMed ID: 36273761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A comparative study of robot-assisted and freehand pedicle screw placement in upper thoracic surgery].
Wang F; Hu J; Tang L; Wan L; Yu Y; Tang Z; Zhang W
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 34(12):1521-1525. PubMed ID: 33319529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating robotic pedicle screw placement against conventional modalities: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Naik A; Smith AD; Shaffer A; Krist DT; Moawad CM; MacInnis BR; Teal K; Hassaneen W; Arnold PM
Neurosurg Focus; 2022 Jan; 52(1):E10. PubMed ID: 34973681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Cranial Facet Joint Violation Rate and Four Other Clinical Indexes Between Robot-assisted and Freehand Pedicle Screw Placement in Spine Surgery: A Meta-analysis.
Zhou LP; Zhang RJ; Li HM; Shen CL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(22):E1532-E1540. PubMed ID: 32756278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Superior-Level Facet Joint Violations Between Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement and Conventional Open Fluoroscopic-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement.
Zhang Q; Xu YF; Tian W; Le XF; Liu B; Liu YJ; He D; Sun YQ; Yuan Q; Lang Z; Han XG
Orthop Surg; 2019 Oct; 11(5):850-856. PubMed ID: 31663290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical application of spinal robot in cervical spine surgery: safety and accuracy of posterior pedicle screw placement in comparison with conventional freehand methods.
Zhou LP; Zhang RJ; Zhang WK; Kang L; Li KX; Zhang HQ; Jia CY; Zhang YS; Shen CL
Neurosurg Rev; 2023 May; 46(1):118. PubMed ID: 37166553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the accuracy between robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu H; Chen W; Wang Z; Lin J; Meng B; Yang H
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Dec; 11(12):2273-2281. PubMed ID: 27334134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement under Regional Anesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Gao S; Wei J; Li W; Zhang L; Cao C; Zhai J; Gao B
Pain Res Manag; 2021; 2021():6894001. PubMed ID: 34966473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Effects of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion by Conventional Open versus Percutaneous Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement in Elderly Patients.
Feng S; Tian W; Wei Y
Orthop Surg; 2020 Feb; 12(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 31880084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Robot-Assisted Surgery on Lumbar Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation in Patients with Osteoporosis.
Feng S; Tian W; Sun Y; Liu Y; Wei Y
World Neurosurg; 2019 May; 125():e1057-e1062. PubMed ID: 30790729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
