206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33370476)
1. A comparative evaluation between the reliability of gypsum casts and digital greyscale intra-oral scans for the scoring of tooth wear using the Tooth Wear Evaluation System (TWES).
Mehta SB; Bronkhorst EM; Crins L; Huysmans MDNJ; Wetselaar P; Loomans BAC
J Oral Rehabil; 2021 Jun; 48(6):678-686. PubMed ID: 33370476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the amount of tooth wear on dental casts and intra-oral photographs.
Wetselaar P; Wetselaar-Glas MJ; Koutris M; Visscher CM; Lobbezoo F
J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 43(8):615-20. PubMed ID: 27132187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tooth Wear Evaluation System (TWES) 2.0-Reliability of diagnosis with and without computer-assisted evaluation.
Roehl JC; Jakstat HA; Becker K; Wetselaar P; Ahlers MO
J Oral Rehabil; 2022 Jan; 49(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 34719055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the progression of tooth wear on dental casts.
Vervoorn-Vis GM; Wetselaar P; Koutris M; Visscher CM; Evälahti M; Ahlberg J; Lobbezoo F
J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Aug; 42(8):600-4. PubMed ID: 25752246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of multiple-degree incisal/occlusal tooth wear assessment on dental casts: findings from a fiveexaminer investigation and related clinical implications.
Paesani DA; Guarda-Nardini L; Gelos C; Salmaso L; Manfredini D
Quintessence Int; 2014 Mar; 45(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 24570994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosing tooth wear, a new taxonomy based on the revised version of the Tooth Wear Evaluation System (TWES 2.0).
Wetselaar P; Wetselaar-Glas MJM; Katzer LD; Ahlers MO
J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Jun; 47(6):703-712. PubMed ID: 32274827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of an occlusal and nonocclusal tooth wear grading system: clinical use versus dental cast assessment.
Wetselaar P; Lobbezoo F; Koutris M; Visscher CM; Naeije M
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):388-90. PubMed ID: 19639077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A reliability study of clinical tooth wear measurements.
Lobbezoo F; Naeije M
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):597-602. PubMed ID: 11753310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tooth Wear Evaluation System 2.0-Evaluation of diagnostic reliability in the assessment of signs and symptoms for tooth wear by non-experts.
Roehl JC; Katzer L; Jakstat HA; Wetselaar P; Ahlers MO
J Oral Rehabil; 2024 Apr; 51(4):712-723. PubMed ID: 38087990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of early attrition using an ordinary flatbed scanner.
Van't Spijker A; Kreulen CM; Bronkhorst EM; Creugers NH
J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):603-8. PubMed ID: 22504528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A PhD completed 6. Tooth Wear Evaluation System: development and applications].
Wetselaar P
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2016 Oct; 123(10):492-494. PubMed ID: 27744475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between incisal/occlusal wear, dentine hypersensitivity and time after the last acid exposure in vivo.
Olley RC; Moazzez R; Bartlett D
J Dent; 2015 Feb; 43(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 25449958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring the progression of erosive tooth wear (ETW) using BEWE index in casts and their 3D images: A retrospective longitudinal study.
Marro F; De Lat L; Martens L; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():70-75. PubMed ID: 29660487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing the reliability of CT scan-based dental wear magnitude scoring.
Godinho RM; Gonçalves C
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2021 Nov; 176(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 34297351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter- and intra-variability in tooth wear progression at surface-, tooth- and patient-level over a period of three years: A cohort study: Inter- and intra-variation in tooth wear progression.
Bronkhorst H; Bronkhorst E; Kalaykova S; Pereira-Cenci T; Huysmans MC; Loomans B
J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104693. PubMed ID: 37683799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Proposed Methodology to Assess the Accuracy of 3D Scanners and Casts and Monitor Tooth Wear Progression in Patients.
Ahmed KE; Whitters J; Ju X; Pierce SG; MacLeod CN; Murray CA
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):514-21. PubMed ID: 27611759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of tooth wear by estimating enamel thickness with quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology.
Kim SK; Park SW; Lee HS; Lee ES; de Josselin de Jong E; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Mar; 25():319-324. PubMed ID: 30648640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of e-training on tooth wear assessments using the BEWE.
Mehta SB; Loomans BAC; Bronkhorst EM; Banerji S; Bartlett DW
J Dent; 2020 Sep; 100():103427. PubMed ID: 32634465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The development of quantitative methods using virtual models for the measurement of tooth wear.
Lee SP; Nam SE; Lee YM; Park YS; Hayashi K; Lee JB
Clin Anat; 2012 Apr; 25(3):347-58. PubMed ID: 21815219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An accurate and efficient method for occlusal tooth wear assessment using 3D digital dental models.
Gkantidis N; Dritsas K; Ren Y; Halazonetis D; Katsaros C
Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10103. PubMed ID: 32572141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
