196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33370670)
1. Improving understanding and management of the complex relationship between visitor motivations and spatial behaviors in parks and protected areas.
Sisneros-Kidd AM; D'Antonio A; Monz C; Mitrovich M
J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 280():111841. PubMed ID: 33370670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of visitor use levels on visitor spatial behavior in off-trail areas of dispersed recreation use.
D'Antonio A; Monz C
J Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 170():79-87. PubMed ID: 26803258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The nature of the pandemic: Exploring the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic upon recreation visitor behaviors and experiences in parks and protected areas.
Ferguson MD; Lynch ML; Evensen D; Ferguson LA; Barcelona R; Giles G; Leberman M
J Outdoor Recreat Tour; 2023 Mar; 41():100498. PubMed ID: 37521260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of minimum impact education on visitor spatial behavior in parks and protected areas: An experimental investigation using GPS-based tracking.
Kidd AM; Monz C; D'Antonio A; Manning RE; Reigner N; Goonan KA; Jacobi C
J Environ Manage; 2015 Oct; 162():53-62. PubMed ID: 26225933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. More than A to B: Understanding and managing visitor spatial behaviour in urban forests using public participation GIS.
Korpilo S; Virtanen T; Saukkonen T; Lehvävirta S
J Environ Manage; 2018 Feb; 207():124-133. PubMed ID: 29156435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhancing the utility of visitor impact assessment in parks and protected areas: a combined social-ecological approach.
D'Antonio A; Monz C; Newman P; Lawson S; Taff D
J Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 124():72-81. PubMed ID: 23624424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Motivations for recreating on farmlands, private forests, and state or national parks.
Sotomayor S; Barbieri C; Wilhelm Stanis S; Aguilar FX; Smith JW
Environ Manage; 2014 Jul; 54(1):138-50. PubMed ID: 24803234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatially characterizing visitor use and its association with informal trails in Yosemite Valley meadows.
Walden-Schreiner C; Leung YF
Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 52(1):163-78. PubMed ID: 23689790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapid Resource Change and Visitor-Use Management: Social-ecological Connections at the Bonneville Salt Flats.
Zajchowski CAB; Brownlee MTJ; Blacketer MP; Peterson BA; Craft K; Bowen BB
Environ Manage; 2020 Aug; 66(2):263-277. PubMed ID: 32564214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The digitalization of outdoor recreation: Global perspectives on the opportunities and challenges for protected area management.
Mangold M; Schwietering A; Zink J; Steinbauer MJ; Heurich M
J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 352():120108. PubMed ID: 38244406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using social media to estimate visitor provenance and patterns of recreation in Germany's national parks.
Sinclair M; Mayer M; Woltering M; Ghermandi A
J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 263():110418. PubMed ID: 32883482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vegetation management for urban park visitors: a mixed methods approach in Portland, Oregon.
Talal ML; Santelmann MV
Ecol Appl; 2020 Jun; 30(4):e02079. PubMed ID: 31972064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward the improvement of trail classification in national parks using the recreation opportunity spectrum approach.
Oishi Y
Environ Manage; 2013 Jun; 51(6):1126-36. PubMed ID: 23615956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding and managing experiential aspects of soundscapes at Muir woods national monument.
Pilcher EJ; Newman P; Manning RE
Environ Manage; 2009 Mar; 43(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 19020928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Harmonizing outdoor recreation and bird conservation targets in protected areas: Applying available monitoring data to facilitate collaborative management at the regional scale.
Pouwels R; Sierdsema H; Foppen RPB; Henkens RJHG; Opdam PFM; van Eupen M
J Environ Manage; 2017 Aug; 198(Pt 1):248-255. PubMed ID: 28467949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of local ecological knowledge, minimum-impact knowledge, and prior experience on visitor perceptions of the ecological impacts of backcountry recreation.
D'Antonio A; Monz C; Newman P; Lawson S; Taff D
Environ Manage; 2012 Oct; 50(4):542-54. PubMed ID: 22814546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visualizing social-ecological intensities for management of recreation visitors in a multiuse system.
DaRugna OA; Chizinski CJ; Pope KL; Powell LA; Kaemingk MA
J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 304():114224. PubMed ID: 34883436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of place attachment and experience use history on perceived depreciative visitor behavior and crowding in an urban national park.
Eder R; Arnberger A
Environ Manage; 2012 Oct; 50(4):566-80. PubMed ID: 22824961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Giving voice to wildlands visitors: selecting indicators to protect and sustain experiences in the eastern arctic of Nunavut.
Watson A; Glaspell B; Christensen N; Lachapelle P; Sahanatien V; Gertsch F
Environ Manage; 2007 Dec; 40(6):880-8. PubMed ID: 17882480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Desktop analysis of potential impacts of visitor use: a case study for the highest park in the Southern Hemisphere.
Barros A; Pickering C; Gudes O
J Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 150():179-195. PubMed ID: 25500135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
