These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33371743)

  • 1. Norwegian Men and Women Value Similar Mate Traits in Short-Term Relationships.
    Mehmetoglu M; Määttänen I
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(4):1474704920979623. PubMed ID: 33371743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals.
    Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K
    J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of resource-gaining capacity on mate preferences: an eye tracking study.
    Zhao Z; Su W; Hou J
    BMC Psychol; 2023 Dec; 11(1):444. PubMed ID: 38111064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations.
    Buss DM; Schmitt DP
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():77-110. PubMed ID: 30230999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings?
    Stulp G; Buunk AP; Pollet TV; Nettle D; Verhulst S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54186. PubMed ID: 23342102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-Rated Attractiveness Moderates the Relationship Between Dark Personality Traits and Romantic Ideals in Women.
    Birkás B; Láng A; Meskó N
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Feb; 121(1):184-200. PubMed ID: 29298572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altruism as an indicator of good parenting quality in long-term relationships: further investigations using the Mate Preferences Towards Altruistic Traits Scale.
    Farrelly D
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 23951948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age Limits.
    Antfolk J
    Evol Psychol; 2017 Mar; 15(1):1474704917690401. PubMed ID: 28127998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Women's Short-Term Mating Orientation and Self-Perceived Attractiveness in Rating and Viewing Men's Waist to Chest Ratios.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):543-551. PubMed ID: 33057831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrasting Computational Models of Mate Preference Integration Across 45 Countries.
    Conroy-Beam D; Buss DM; Asao K; Sorokowska A; Sorokowski P; Aavik T; Akello G; Alhabahba MM; Alm C; Amjad N; Anjum A; Atama CS; Duyar DA; Ayebare R; Batres C; Bendixen M; Bensafia A; Bizumic B; Boussena M; Butovskaya M; Can S; Cantarero K; Carrier A; Cetinkaya H; Croy I; Cueto RM; Czub M; Dronova D; Dural S; Duyar I; Ertugrul B; Espinosa A; Estevan I; Esteves CS; Fang L; Frackowiak T; Garduño JC; González KU; Guemaz F; Gyuris P; Halamová M; Herak I; Horvat M; Hromatko I; Hui CM; Jaafar JL; Jiang F; Kafetsios K; Kavčič T; Kennair LEO; Kervyn N; Thi Khanh Ha T; Khilji IA; Köbis NC; Lan HM; Láng A; Lennard GR; León E; Lindholm T; Thi Linh T; Lopez G; Van Luot N; Mailhos A; Manesi Z; Martinez R; McKerchar SL; Meskó N; Misra G; Monaghan C; Mora EC; Moya-Garófano A; Musil B; Natividade JC; Niemczyk A; Nizharadze G; Oberzaucher E; Oleszkiewicz A; Omar-Fauzee MS; Onyishi IE; Özener B; Pagani AF; Pakalniskiene V; Parise M; Pazhoohi F; Pisanski A; Pisanski K; Ponciano E; Popa C; Prokop P; Rizwan M; Sainz M; Salkičević S; Sargautyte R; Sarmány-Schuller I; Schmehl S; Sharad S; Siddiqui RS; Simonetti F; Stoyanova SY; Tadinac M; Varella MAC; Vauclair CM; Vega LD; Widarini DA; Yoo G; Zaťková M; Zupančič M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16885. PubMed ID: 31729413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Research Note on the Influence of Relationship Length and Sex on Preferences for Altruistic and Cooperative Mates.
    Bhogal MS; Galbraith N; Manktelow K
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Apr; 122(2):550-557. PubMed ID: 29618294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship dealbreakers: traits people avoid in potential mates.
    Jonason PK; Garcia JR; Webster GD; Li NP; Fisher HE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Dec; 41(12):1697-711. PubMed ID: 26445853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Mediating Role of Parental Influence on the Relationship Between Adult Children's Filial Piety Beliefs and Mate Preferences.
    Zhang LR; Chen WW
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(4):1474704920969110. PubMed ID: 33107335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental Evidence for Sex Differences in Sexual Variety Preferences: Support for the Coolidge Effect in Humans.
    Hughes SM; Aung T; Harrison MA; LaFayette JN; Gallup GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):495-509. PubMed ID: 32440927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Long-Term Mate Preferences in Iran.
    Atari M
    Evol Psychol; 2017; 15(2):1474704917702459. PubMed ID: 28401792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women's Mating Strategies and Mate Value Are Associated with Viewing Time to Facial Masculinity.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2023 Jul; 52(5):2143-2151. PubMed ID: 37245165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.