These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3337182)

  • 21. [Fetal heart rate patterns in response to acoustic stimulation].
    Iida M
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Nov; 43(11):1561-7. PubMed ID: 1940554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correlation of fetal heart rate decelerations following acoustic stimulation with perinatal outcome.
    Dunston-Boone G; Kuhlman K; Kaufmann M
    Am J Perinatol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 8540939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: early neonatal outcomes associated with normal rate, fetal stress, and fetal distress.
    Dellinger EH; Boehm FH; Crane MM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 182(1 Pt 1):214-20. PubMed ID: 10649181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Admission test: a screening test for fetal distress in labor.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):143-4. PubMed ID: 3601263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Fetal admission test and fetal heart rate response to vibratory stimuli test].
    Wu L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Oct; 30(10):633-5. PubMed ID: 8745511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Clinical analysis of continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring for preterm small for gestational age during labor].
    Guo XH; Su FM; Zhang HY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 40(2):106-8. PubMed ID: 15840290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The use of acoustic stimuli for assessing fetal status ante- and intranatally].
    Samodurov PS
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Nov; (11):33-6. PubMed ID: 1814224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reliability of admission cardiotocography for intrapartum monitoring in low resource setting.
    Rahman H; Renjhen P; Dutta S
    Niger Med J; 2012 Jul; 53(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 23293415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. III. Predictive value of a reactive test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Broussard P; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Feb; 33(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 3351822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fetal responses to vibratory acoustic stimulation: influence of basal heart rate.
    Gagnon R; Hunse C; Patrick J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Oct; 159(4):835-9. PubMed ID: 3177532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inter-observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts.
    Blix E; Sviggum O; Koss KS; Øian P
    BJOG; 2003 Jan; 110(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12504927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fetal scalp stimulation test: an adjunct to intermittent auscultation in non-reassuring fetal status during labor.
    Rathore AM; Ramji S; Devi CB; Saini S; Manaktala U; Batra S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Jul; 37(7):819-24. PubMed ID: 21410829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Platt LD; Broussard P; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jul; 155(1):131-4. PubMed ID: 3524234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of a trial of labor with a positive contraction stress test.
    Bissonnette JM; Johnson K; Toomey C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 135(3):292-6. PubMed ID: 484615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fetal 'fright-bradycardia' brought on by air-raid alarm in Israel.
    Yoles I; Hod M; Kaplan B; Ovadia J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1993 Feb; 40(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 8094687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Fetal assessment of the labor admission in low risk pregnancies].
    Poulain P; Mercier C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S16-22. PubMed ID: 18191911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intrapartum repetitive maternal heart rate deceleration pattern simulating nonreassuring fetal status.
    Sherer DM; Dalloul M; Pierre N; Abulafia O
    Am J Perinatol; 2005 Apr; 22(3):165-7. PubMed ID: 15838752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate during labor: an opportunity for shared decision making.
    Hersh S; Megregian M; Emeis C
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 24758413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Short fetal acoustic stimulation test for rapid antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tannirandorn Y; Kittipibul V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 11460963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. When should foetal pH measurements be performed after a prolonged deceleration? An experimental study in a fetal sheep model.
    Dupuis H; Ghesquière L; De Jonckheere J; Aubry E; Sharma D; Deruelle P; Storme L; Houfflin-Debarge V; Garabedian C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jul; 226():54-58. PubMed ID: 29843068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.