These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Fetal acid-base balance in low-risk patients in labor. Ingemarsson I; Arulkumaran S Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jul; 155(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 3089016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Implications of prolonged fetal heart rate deceleration during the second stage of labor. Wu RW; Chen CP; Wang KG J Formos Med Assoc; 1996 Mar; 95(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 8857256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Diagnostic evaluation of fetal distress during pregnancy by a sound stimulation test]. Querleu D; Boutteville C; Renard X; Crépin G J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1984; 13(7):789-96. PubMed ID: 6526980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The significance of fetal heart rate reactivity with a positive oxytocin challenge test. Braly P; Freeman RK Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Dec; 50(6):689-93. PubMed ID: 927760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Cardiotocography admission monitoring and intermittent intrapartum monitoring for fetal distress in labour]. Yan P Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1993 Apr; 28(4):217-9, 253. PubMed ID: 8404305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Significance of sporadic heart rate deceleration during a nonstress test. Woo JS; Poon IM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):708. PubMed ID: 4061541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variation in postterm pregnancy: prediction of intrapartum fetal distress and fetal acidosis. Weiner Z; Farmakides G; Schulman H; Kellner L; Plancher S; Maulik D Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1132-8. PubMed ID: 7943086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Labor admission test: an assessment of the test's value as screening for fetal distress in labor. Blix E; Øian P Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Aug; 80(8):738-43. PubMed ID: 11531617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A randomized controlled trial of a new fetal acoustic stimulation test for fetal well-being. Marden D; McDuffie RS; Allen R; Abitz D Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1386-8. PubMed ID: 9215204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Clinical use of central electronic monitoring system]. Guo X; Xu H; Xie K Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11831942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Clinical significance of fetal heart rate patterns during labor. I. Baseline patterns. Cibils LA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jun; 125(3):290-305. PubMed ID: 1275022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The role of electronic fetal monitoring in labour. Ingemarsson I; Herbst A J Perinat Med; 1991; 19 Suppl 1():134-8. PubMed ID: 1779348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Acoustic stimulation as a diagnostic test: comparison with oxytocin challenge test. Schiff E; Lipitz S; Sivan E; Barkai G; Mashiach S J Perinat Med; 1992; 20(4):275-9. PubMed ID: 1432551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Fetal surveillance during labor: the role of the expert witness. Schifrin BS; Rubinstein TH J Perinatol; 1993; 13(2):151-2. PubMed ID: 8515310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Influence of the fetal scalp electrode stimulation test on fetal heart rate and body movements in quiet and active behavioral states during labor. Zimmer EZ; Vadasz A Am J Perinatol; 1989 Jan; 6(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 2910315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]