158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33371950)
1. Differential prognostic impact of different Gleason patterns in grade group 4 in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Mori K; Sharma V; Comperat EM; Sato S; Laukhtina E; Schuettfort VM; Pradere B; Parizi MK; Karakiewicz PI; Egawa S; Tilki D; Boorjian SA; Shariat SF
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 May; 47(5):1172-1178. PubMed ID: 33371950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.
Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF
Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Turker P; Bas E; Bozkurt S; Günlüsoy B; Sezgin A; Postacı H; Turkeri L
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 21316989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic Impact of Different Gleason Patterns on Biopsy Within Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer.
Mori K; Sharma V; Comperat EM; Sato S; Laukhtina E; Schuettfort VM; Pradere B; Sari Motlagh R; Mostafaei H; Quhal F; Kardoust Parizi M; Abufaraj M; Karakiewicz PI; Egawa S; Tilki D; Boorjian SA; Shariat SF
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(13):9179-9187. PubMed ID: 34117577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grade Groups Provide Improved Predictions of Pathological and Early Oncologic Outcomes Compared with Gleason Score Risk Groups.
Kirmiz S; Qi J; Babitz SK; Linsell S; Denton B; Singh K; Auffenberg G; Montie JE; Lane BR
J Urol; 2019 Feb; 201(2):278-283. PubMed ID: 30195846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.
Song W; Lee DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Kim JW; Lee S; Byun SS; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Cho JS; Ahn H; Jeon SS
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 28823006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Significance of Primary Biopsy Gleason 5 in Patients with Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer.
Tilki D; Würnschimmel C; Preisser F; Graefen M; Huland H; Mandel P; Tennstedt P
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):255-258. PubMed ID: 32033909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic significance of the presence of tertiary Gleason grade 5 in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy specimens in Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Kamoda N; Ohori M; Hirasawa Y; Inoue R; Hashimoto T; Satake N; Gondo T; Nakagami Y; Nagao T; Ohno Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2019 Mar; 49(3):276-280. PubMed ID: 30649377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The prognostic impact of downgrading and upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy among men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer.
Jang WS; Koh DH; Kim J; Lee JS; Chung DY; Ham WS; Rha KH; Choi YD
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1805-1810. PubMed ID: 31483062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and tumor volume predict adverse pathological stage and margin status at radical prostatectomy in grade Group 2 and grade Group 3 prostate cancers.
Iakymenko OA; Lugo I; Briski LM; Nemov I; Punnen S; Kwon D; Pollack A; Stoyanova R; Parekh DJ; Jorda M; Gonzalgo ML; Kryvenko ON
Prostate; 2021 Sep; 81(12):866-873. PubMed ID: 34184782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The New Prostate Cancer Grading System Does Not Improve Prediction of Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Large, Two-Center Validation Study.
Dell'Oglio P; Karnes RJ; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Stabile A; Moschini M; Cucchiara V; Zaffuto E; Karakiewicz PI; Suardi N; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Prostate; 2017 Feb; 77(3):263-273. PubMed ID: 27753114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome after radical prostatectomy with a pretreatment prostate biopsy Gleason score of >/=8.
Manoharan M; Bird VG; Kim SS; Civantos F; Soloway MS
BJU Int; 2003 Oct; 92(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 14511029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
Heo JE; Park JS; Lee JS; Kim J; Jang WS; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Ham WS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(42):e17627. PubMed ID: 31626145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary Gleason pattern in biopsy Gleason score 7 is predictive of adverse histopathological features and biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy.
Berg KD; Røder MA; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 23889119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
