These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3337331)

  • 1. The 1989 revisions of the US Standard Certificates of Live Birth and Death and the US Standard Report of Fetal Death.
    Freedman MA; Gay GA; Brockert JE; Potrzebowski PW; Rothwell CJ
    Am J Public Health; 1988 Feb; 78(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 3337331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The 1989 revision of the U.S. Standard Certificates and Reports.
    Tolson GC; Barnes JM; Gay GA; Kowaleski JL
    Vital Health Stat 4; 1991 Jun; (28):1-34. PubMed ID: 1713727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revised U.S. certificate of birth--new opportunities for research on birth outcome.
    Taffel SM; Ventura SJ; Gay GA
    Birth; 1989 Dec; 16(4):188-93. PubMed ID: 2610783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expanded health data from the new birth certificate, 2005.
    Menacker F; Martin JA
    Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2008 Feb; 56(13):1-24. PubMed ID: 18472694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expanded health data from the new birth certificate, 2006.
    Osterman MJ; Martin JA; Menacker F
    Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2009 Oct; 58(5):1-24. PubMed ID: 20085193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisions of U.S. standard certificates on vital events.
    Lunde AS
    Public Health Rep (1896); 1967 Oct; 82(10):913-6. PubMed ID: 4964121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Birth and fetal death records and environmental exposures: promising data elements for environmental public health tracking of reproductive outcomes.
    Fitzgerald E; Wartenberg D; Thompson WD; Houston A
    Public Health Rep; 2009; 124(6):825-30. PubMed ID: 19894425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expanded health data from the new birth certificate, 2004.
    Martin JA; Menacker F
    Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2007 Apr; 55(12):1-22. PubMed ID: 17489475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expanded data from the new birth certificate, 2008.
    Osterman MJ; Martin JA; Mathews TJ; Hamilton BE
    Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2011 Jul; 59(7):1-28. PubMed ID: 21848043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contribution of maternal age and pregnancy checkbox on maternal mortality ratios in the United States, 1978-2012.
    Davis NL; Hoyert DL; Goodman DA; Hirai AH; Callaghan WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):352.e1-352.e7. PubMed ID: 28483570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Demographic implications of the New United States certificates.
    Lunde AS; Grove RD
    Demography; 1966 Jun; 3(2):566-73. PubMed ID: 21318726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Report on the 2003 revision of the U.S. Standard Certificate of Death.
    Davis GG; Onaka AT
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2001 Mar; 22(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 11444659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experiences with linked birth and infant death certificates from the NIMS project.
    Strauss LT; Freedman MA; Gunter N; Powell-Griner E; Smith JC
    Public Health Rep; 1987; 102(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 3104978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The United States Standard Certificate of Live Birth. A critical commentary.
    Luke B; Keith LG
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):587-91. PubMed ID: 1658322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of unlinked infant death certificates from the NIMS project.
    Lambert DA; Strauss LT
    Public Health Rep; 1987; 102(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 3104977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pregnant? Validity of the pregnancy checkbox on death certificates in four states, and characteristics associated with pregnancy checkbox errors.
    Catalano A; Davis NL; Petersen EE; Harrison C; Kieltyka L; You M; Conrey EJ; Ewing AC; Callaghan WM; Goodman DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):269.e1-269.e8. PubMed ID: 31639369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the quality of medical and health data from the 2003 birth certificate revision: results from two states.
    Martin JA; Wilson EC; Osterman MJ; Saadi EW; Sutton SR; Hamilton BE
    Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2013 Jul; 62(2):1-19. PubMed ID: 24979975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reengineering vital registration and statistics systems for the United States.
    Rothwell CJ
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2004 Oct; 1(4):A03. PubMed ID: 15670434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records.
    Piper JM; Mitchel EF; Snowden M; Hall C; Adams M; Taylor P
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Apr; 137(7):758-68. PubMed ID: 8484367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The national fetal death file.
    Martin JA; Hoyert DL
    Semin Perinatol; 2002 Feb; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11876564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.