138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33373471)
1. Comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed modular tibial components in endoprosthetic reconstruction of the distal femur.
Bukowski BR; Tagliero AJ; Heidenreich MJ; Johnson JD; Rose PS; Houdek MT
J Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 123(4):1126-1133. PubMed ID: 33373471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What Are the Long-term Results of MUTARS
Bus MP; van de Sande MA; Fiocco M; Schaap GR; Bramer JA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):708-718. PubMed ID: 26649558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metal or Modularity: Why Do Metal-Backed Tibias Have Inferior Outcomes to All-Polyethylene Tibial Components in Patients With Osteoarthritis.
Houdek MT; Watts CD; Wyles CC; Martin JR; Trousdale RT; Taunton MJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar; 32(3):836-842. PubMed ID: 27816367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Length of Endoprosthetic Reconstruction in Revision Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Complications and Reoperations.
Barry JJ; Thielen Z; Sing DC; Yi PH; Hansen EN; Ries M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 27093862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. All-Polyethylene Versus Metal-Backed Tibial Components-An Analysis of 27,733 Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacements from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register.
Gudnason A; Hailer NP; W-Dahl A; Sundberg M; Robertsson O
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 96(12):994-999. PubMed ID: 24951734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does a Competing Risk Analysis Show Differences in the Cumulative Incidence of Revision Surgery Between Patients with Oncologic and Non-oncologic Conditions After Distal Femur Replacement?
Staats K; Vertesich K; Sigmund IK; Sosa B; Kaider A; Funovics PT; Windhager R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 May; 478(5):1062-1073. PubMed ID: 31895069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcomes of cemented distal femur replacements with all-polyethylene tibial components for oncologic indications.
Christ AB; Chung BC; Urness M; Mayer LW; Gettleman BS; Heckmann ND; Menendez LR
World J Orthop; 2023 Apr; 14(4):218-230. PubMed ID: 37155507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of Cemented Distal Femoral Replacement Using "Line to Line" Technique With All-Polyethylene Tibial Implant for Tumors.
Tayara B; Nooh A; Chalopin A; Goulding K; Turcotte RE
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Aug; 36(8):2913-2920. PubMed ID: 33840535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proximal Tibia Reconstruction After Bone Tumor Resection: Are Survivorship and Outcomes of Endoprosthetic Replacement and Osteoarticular Allograft Similar?
Albergo JI; Gaston CL; Aponte-Tinao LA; Ayerza MA; Muscolo DL; Farfalli GL; Jeys LM; Carter SR; Tillman RM; Abudu AT; Grimer RJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):676-682. PubMed ID: 27103142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival, failure modes and function of combined distal femur and proximal tibia reconstruction following tumor resection.
Sevelda F; Waldstein W; Panotopoulos J; Stihsen C; Kaider A; Funovics PT; Windhager R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Feb; 43(2):416-422. PubMed ID: 27912929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: all-poly versus metal-backed tibial component-a long-term follow-up study.
Sessa V; Celentano U
Int Orthop; 2021 Dec; 45(12):3063-3068. PubMed ID: 33877407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival, complications and functional outcomes of cemented megaprostheses for high-grade osteosarcoma around the knee.
Zhang C; Hu J; Zhu K; Cai T; Ma X
Int Orthop; 2018 Apr; 42(4):927-938. PubMed ID: 29427125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What are the functional outcomes of endoprosthestic reconstructions after tumor resection?
Bernthal NM; Greenberg M; Heberer K; Eckardt JJ; Fowler EG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Mar; 473(3):812-9. PubMed ID: 24777730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. All-polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.
Longo UG; Ciuffreda M; D'Andrea V; Mannering N; Locher J; Denaro V
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3620-3636. PubMed ID: 27209191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revision of Unicompartmental to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does the Unicompartmental Implant (Metal-Backed vs All-Polyethylene) Impact the Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Scott CEH; Powell-Bowns MFR; MacDonald DJ; Simpson PM; Wade FA
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2203-2209. PubMed ID: 29525342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of a Modular Intercalary Endoprosthesis as Treatment for Segmental Defects of the Femur, Tibia, and Humerus.
Benevenia J; Kirchner R; Patterson F; Beebe K; Wirtz DC; Rivero S; Palma M; Friedrich MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):539-48. PubMed ID: 26475032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finn/Orthopaedic Salvage System Distal Femoral Rotating-Hinge Megaprostheses in Oncologic Patients: Long-Term Complications, Reoperations, and Amputations.
Ogura K; Yakoub MA; Boland PJ; Healey JH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Apr; 103(8):705-714. PubMed ID: 33411462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Long-Term Results of Total Knee Replacement Using P.F.C. Sigma System with an All-Polyethylene Tibial Component].
Nachtnebl L; Tomáš T; Apostolopoulos V; Pazourek L; Mahdal M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2021; 88(6):412-417. PubMed ID: 34998443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. All-polyethylene tibial components in distal femur limb-salvage surgery: a finite element analysis based on promising clinical outcomes.
Tang F; Zhou Y; Zhang W; Min L; Shi R; Luo Y; Duan H; Tu C
J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Apr; 12(1):57. PubMed ID: 28376828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. All-Polyethylene Tibial Components: An Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes and Infection.
Houdek MT; Wagner ER; Wyles CC; Watts CD; Cass JR; Trousdale RT
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1476-82. PubMed ID: 27067171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
