117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33373979)
1. A commercial treatment planning system with a hybrid dose calculation algorithm for synchrotron radiotherapy trials.
Day LRJ; Donzelli M; Pellicioli P; Smyth LML; Barnes M; Bartzsch S; Crosbie JC
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(5):055016. PubMed ID: 33373979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Monte Carlo model of synchrotron radiotherapy shows good agreement with experimental dosimetry measurements: Data from the imaging and medical beamline at the Australian Synchrotron.
Day LRJ; Pellicioli P; Gagliardi F; Barnes M; Smyth LML; Butler D; Livingstone J; Stevenson AW; Lye J; Poole CM; Hausermann D; Rogers PAW; Crosbie JC
Phys Med; 2020 Sep; 77():64-74. PubMed ID: 32791426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo-based treatment planning system calculation engine for microbeam radiation therapy.
Martinez-Rovira I; Sempau J; Prezado Y
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2829-38. PubMed ID: 22559655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and commissioning of a Monte Carlo photon beam model for the forthcoming clinical trials in microbeam radiation therapy.
Martínez-Rovira I; Sempau J; Prezado Y
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):119-31. PubMed ID: 22225281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward automated and personalized organ dose determination in CT examinations - A comparison of two tissue characterization models for Monte Carlo organ dose calculation with a Therapy Planning System.
Källman HE; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):1012-1023. PubMed ID: 30582891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
Fragoso M; Wen N; Kumar S; Liu D; Ryu S; Movsas B; Munther A; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4445-64. PubMed ID: 20668343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simple technique to improve calculated skin dose accuracy in a commercial treatment planning system.
Wang L; Cmelak AJ; Ding GX
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 29411506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proton range verification in inhomogeneous tissue: Treatment planning system vs. measurement vs. Monte Carlo simulation.
Kim DH; Cho S; Jo K; Shin E; Hong CS; Han Y; Suh TS; Lim DH; Choi DH
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193904. PubMed ID: 29505589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A high-resolution dose calculation engine for X-ray microbeams radiation therapy.
Keshmiri S; Brocard S; Serduc R; Adam JF
Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3999-4017. PubMed ID: 35342953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-density dental implants and radiotherapy planning: evaluation of effects on dose distribution using pencil beam convolution algorithm and Monte Carlo method.
Çatli S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):46–52. PubMed ID: 26699323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of two commercial electron beam algorithms over regions close to the lung-mediastinum interface, against Monte Carlo simulation and point dosimetry in virtual and anthropomorphic phantoms.
Ojala J; Hyödynmaa S; Barańczyk R; Góra E; Waligórski MP
Phys Med; 2014 Mar; 30(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 23702438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the use of a convolution-superposition algorithm for plan checking in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Hardcastle N; Oborn BM; Haworth A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):99-110. PubMed ID: 27685114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo calculations of radiotherapy dose in "homogeneous" anatomy.
Kairn T; Livingstone AG; Crowe SB
Phys Med; 2020 Oct; 78():156-165. PubMed ID: 33035927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a Geant4-based independent patient dose validation system with an elaborate multileaf collimator simulation model.
Choi HJ; Park H; Shin WG; Kim JI; Min CH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 20(2):94-106. PubMed ID: 30672648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
