These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33375209)

  • 1. Facial EMG Activity Is Associated with Hedonic Experiences but not Nutritional Values While Viewing Food Images.
    Sato W; Yoshikawa S; Fushiki T
    Nutrients; 2020 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 33375209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial EMG Correlates of Subjective Hedonic Responses During Food Consumption.
    Sato W; Minemoto K; Ikegami A; Nakauma M; Funami T; Fushiki T
    Nutrients; 2020 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 32331423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brow and Masticatory Muscle Activity Senses Subjective Hedonic Experiences during Food Consumption.
    Sato W; Ikegami A; Ishihara S; Nakauma M; Funami T; Yoshikawa S; Fushiki T
    Nutrients; 2021 Nov; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 34959773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crosstalk in Facial EMG and Its Reduction Using ICA.
    Sato W; Kochiyama T
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 36904924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Machine Learning-Based Interpretable Modeling for Subjective Emotional Dynamics Sensing Using Facial EMG.
    Kawamura N; Sato W; Shimokawa K; Fujita T; Kawanishi Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Feb; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 38475072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploration of Emotion Dynamics Sensing Using Trapezius EMG and Fingertip Temperature.
    Sato W; Kochiyama T
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(17):. PubMed ID: 36081011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physiological correlates of subjective emotional valence and arousal dynamics while viewing films.
    Sato W; Kochiyama T; Yoshikawa S
    Biol Psychol; 2020 Nov; 157():107974. PubMed ID: 33086090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective-Physiological Coherence during Food Consumption in Older Adults.
    Saito A; Sato W; Ikegami A; Ishihara S; Nakauma M; Funami T; Fushiki T; Yoshikawa S
    Nutrients; 2022 Nov; 14(22):. PubMed ID: 36432423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial responses of adult humans during the anticipation and consumption of touch and food rewards.
    Korb S; Massaccesi C; Gartus A; Lundström JN; Rumiati R; Eisenegger C; Silani G
    Cognition; 2020 Jan; 194():104044. PubMed ID: 31499297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An unfamiliar social presence reduces facial disgust responses to food stimuli.
    Nath EC; Cannon PR; Philipp MC
    Food Res Int; 2019 Dec; 126():108662. PubMed ID: 31732049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emotional valence sensing using a wearable facial EMG device.
    Sato W; Murata K; Uraoka Y; Shibata K; Yoshikawa S; Furuta M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):5757. PubMed ID: 33707605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationships among facial mimicry, emotional experience, and emotion recognition.
    Sato W; Fujimura T; Kochiyama T; Suzuki N
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e57889. PubMed ID: 23536774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial EMG reactions to facial expressions: a case of facial emotional contagion?
    Lundqvist LO
    Scand J Psychol; 1995 Jun; 36(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 7644897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [EMG reactions of mimetic muscles after repeated presentation of pictures with positive, negative and neutral content].
    Jäncke L
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(3):434-54. PubMed ID: 1441652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceived unpleasantness and facial reactions to auditory stimuli.
    Dimberg U
    Scand J Psychol; 1990; 31(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 2333489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial electromyography and subjective liking data from 70 New Zealand participants in response to food images and chocolate samples.
    Nath EC; Cannon PR; Philipp MC
    Data Brief; 2020 Apr; 29():105124. PubMed ID: 31993472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EMG activity in response to static and dynamic facial expressions.
    Rymarczyk K; Biele C; Grabowska A; Majczynski H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 21074582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Affect dynamics of facial EMG during continuous emotional experiences.
    Golland Y; Hakim A; Aloni T; Schaefer S; Levit-Binnun N
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Nov; 139():47-58. PubMed ID: 30300673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhanced emotional and motor responses to live versus videotaped dynamic facial expressions.
    Hsu CT; Sato W; Yoshikawa S
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16825. PubMed ID: 33033355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The face of schadenfreude: Differentiation of joy and schadenfreude by electromyography.
    Boecker L; Likowski KU; Pauli P; Weyers P
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(6):1117-25. PubMed ID: 25297966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.