217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33375557)
1. Validation of Zulu Watch against Polysomnography and Actigraphy for On-Wrist Sleep-Wake Determination and Sleep-Depth Estimation.
Devine JK; Chinoy ED; Markwald RR; Schwartz LP; Hursh SR
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 33375557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Commercial Wrist-Based and Smartphone Accelerometers, Actigraphy, and PSG in a Clinical Cohort of Children and Adolescents.
Toon E; Davey MJ; Hollis SL; Nixon GM; Horne RS; Biggs SN
J Clin Sleep Med; 2016 Mar; 12(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 26446248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting sleep using heart rate and motion data from multisensor consumer-grade wearables, relative to wrist actigraphy and polysomnography.
Roberts DM; Schade MM; Mathew GM; Gartenberg D; Buxton OM
Sleep; 2020 Jul; 43(7):. PubMed ID: 32215550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Sleep-Wake Scoring of a New Wrist-Worn Sleep Monitoring Device.
Pigeon WR; Taylor M; Bui A; Oleynk C; Walsh P; Bishop TM
J Clin Sleep Med; 2018 Jun; 14(6):1057-1062. PubMed ID: 29852899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of the Fitbit Flex to evaluate sleep in major depressive disorder: A comparison against polysomnography and wrist-worn actigraphy.
Cook JD; Prairie ML; Plante DT
J Affect Disord; 2017 Aug; 217():299-305. PubMed ID: 28448949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Actigraphy-based sleep estimation in adolescents and adults: a comparison with polysomnography using two scoring algorithms.
Quante M; Kaplan ER; Cailler M; Rueschman M; Wang R; Weng J; Taveras EM; Redline S
Nat Sci Sleep; 2018; 10():13-20. PubMed ID: 29403321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving Sleep Quality Assessment Using Wearable Sensors by Including Information From Postural/Sleep Position Changes and Body Acceleration: A Comparison of Chest-Worn Sensors, Wrist Actigraphy, and Polysomnography.
Razjouyan J; Lee H; Parthasarathy S; Mohler J; Sharafkhaneh A; Najafi B
J Clin Sleep Med; 2017 Nov; 13(11):1301-1310. PubMed ID: 28992827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2™ compared with polysomnography in adults.
de Zambotti M; Goldstone A; Claudatos S; Colrain IM; Baker FC
Chronobiol Int; 2018 Apr; 35(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29235907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison and correlation analysis of sleep parameters between watch-type sleep monitor (Actiwatch) and polysomnography].
Huo Y; Zhou B; He HY; Zhao L; Zhang XL; Li J; Zuo YH; Zheng Y; Ren ZH; Han F; Zhang J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):942-945. PubMed ID: 34650299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of seven consumer sleep-tracking devices compared with polysomnography.
Chinoy ED; Cuellar JA; Huwa KE; Jameson JT; Watson CH; Bessman SC; Hirsch DA; Cooper AD; Drummond SPA; Markwald RR
Sleep; 2021 May; 44(5):. PubMed ID: 33378539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of Actigraphy in Measurement of Sleep in Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.
Farabi SS; Quinn L; Carley DW
J Clin Sleep Med; 2017 May; 13(5):669-674. PubMed ID: 28162146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of Fitbit Charge 4 for assessing sleep in Chinese patients with chronic insomnia: A comparison against polysomnography and actigraphy.
Dong X; Yang S; Guo Y; Lv P; Wang M; Li Y
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275287. PubMed ID: 36256631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PSG Validation of minute-to-minute scoring for sleep and wake periods in a consumer wearable device.
Cheung J; Leary EB; Lu H; Zeitzer JM; Mignot E
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238464. PubMed ID: 32941498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validating actigraphy as a measure of sleep for preschool children.
Bélanger MÈ; Bernier A; Paquet J; Simard V; Carrier J
J Clin Sleep Med; 2013 Jul; 9(7):701-6. PubMed ID: 23853565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Motionlogger Watch and Actiwatch actigraphs to polysomnography for sleep/wake estimation in healthy young adults.
Rupp TL; Balkin TJ
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1152-60. PubMed ID: 21512871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of Photoplethysmography-Based Sleep Staging Compared With Polysomnography in Healthy Middle-Aged Adults.
Fonseca P; Weysen T; Goelema MS; Møst EIS; Radha M; Lunsingh Scheurleer C; van den Heuvel L; Aarts RM
Sleep; 2017 Jul; 40(7):. PubMed ID: 28838130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of photoplethysmography- and acceleration-based sleep staging in a community sample: comparison with polysomnography and Actiwatch.
Liu PK; Ting N; Chiu HC; Lin YC; Liu YT; Ku BW; Lee PL
J Clin Sleep Med; 2023 Oct; 19(10):1797-1810. PubMed ID: 37338335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct comparison of two new actigraphs and polysomnography in children and adolescents.
Meltzer LJ; Walsh CM; Traylor J; Westin AM
Sleep; 2012 Jan; 35(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 22215930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of a Commercial Accelerometer with Polysomnography and Actigraphy in Children and Adolescents.
Meltzer LJ; Hiruma LS; Avis K; Montgomery-Downs H; Valentin J
Sleep; 2015 Aug; 38(8):1323-30. PubMed ID: 26118555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of Sleep Measures from Four Personal Health Monitoring Devices Compared to Research-Based Actigraphy and Polysomnography.
Mantua J; Gravel N; Spencer RM
Sensors (Basel); 2016 May; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 27164110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
