BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33375727)

  • 1. Study of Microchannels Fabricated Using Desktop Fused Deposition Modeling Systems.
    Rehmani MAA; Jaywant SA; Arif KM
    Micromachines (Basel); 2020 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 33375727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fabrication of Different Microchannels by Adjusting the Extrusion Parameters for Sacrificial Molds.
    Tang W; Liu H; Zhu L; Shi J; Li Z; Xiang N; Yang J
    Micromachines (Basel); 2019 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 31426534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamics of Capillary-Driven Flow in 3D Printed Open Microchannels.
    Lade RK; Hippchen EJ; Macosko CW; Francis LF
    Langmuir; 2017 Mar; 33(12):2949-2964. PubMed ID: 28274121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Low-Cost 3-in-1 3D Printer as a Tool for the Fabrication of Flow-Through Channels of Microfluidic Systems.
    Thaweskulchai T; Schulte A
    Micromachines (Basel); 2021 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 34442569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fabrication of Hard-Soft Microfluidic Devices Using Hybrid 3D Printing.
    Ruiz C; Kadimisetty K; Yin K; Mauk MG; Zhao H; Liu C
    Micromachines (Basel); 2020 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 32492980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding and improving FDM 3D printing to fabricate high-resolution and optically transparent microfluidic devices.
    Quero RF; Domingos da Silveira G; Fracassi da Silva JA; Jesus DP
    Lab Chip; 2021 Sep; 21(19):3715-3729. PubMed ID: 34355724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Microfluidic Performance of Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Platforms.
    Macdonald NP; Cabot JM; Smejkal P; Guijt RM; Paull B; Breadmore MC
    Anal Chem; 2017 Apr; 89(7):3858-3866. PubMed ID: 28281349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) for Manufacturing of Microfluidic Micromixers: An Experimental Study on the Effect of Process Variables in Printed Microfluidic Micromixers.
    Zeraatkar M; de Tullio MD; Percoco G
    Micromachines (Basel); 2021 Jul; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 34442481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strength of PLA Components Fabricated with Fused Deposition Technology Using a Desktop 3D Printer as a Function of Geometrical Parameters of the Process.
    Kuznetsov VE; Solonin AN; Urzhumtsev OD; Schilling R; Tavitov AG
    Polymers (Basel); 2018 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 30966348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facile Route for 3D Printing of Transparent PETg-Based Hybrid Biomicrofluidic Devices Promoting Cell Adhesion.
    Mehta V; Vilikkathala Sudhakaran S; Rath SN
    ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2021 Aug; 7(8):3947-3963. PubMed ID: 34282888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of 3D-printed molds for fabrication of non-planar microchannels.
    Parthiban P; Vijayan S; Doyle PS; Hashimoto M
    Biomicrofluidics; 2021 Mar; 15(2):024111. PubMed ID: 33912266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Manufacturing of 3D-Printed Microfluidic Devices for the Synthesis of Drug-Loaded Liposomal Formulations.
    Ballacchino G; Weaver E; Mathew E; Dorati R; Genta I; Conti B; Lamprou DA
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Jul; 22(15):. PubMed ID: 34360832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual Sacrificial Molding: Fabricating 3D Microchannels with Overhang and Helical Features.
    Goh WH; Hashimoto M
    Micromachines (Basel); 2018 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 30424456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D Printing of Inertial Microfluidic Devices.
    Razavi Bazaz S; Rouhi O; Raoufi MA; Ejeian F; Asadnia M; Jin D; Ebrahimi Warkiani M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):5929. PubMed ID: 32246111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microfluidics for nanomedicines manufacturing: An affordable and low-cost 3D printing approach.
    Tiboni M; Tiboni M; Pierro A; Del Papa M; Sparaventi S; Cespi M; Casettari L
    Int J Pharm; 2021 Apr; 599():120464. PubMed ID: 33713759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Negligible-cost microfluidic device fabrication using 3D-printed interconnecting channel scaffolds.
    Felton H; Hughes R; Diaz-Gaxiola A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245206. PubMed ID: 33534849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electroosmotic flow in fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D-printed microchannels.
    Barbosa FHB; Quero RF; Rocha KN; Costa SC; de Jesus DP
    Electrophoresis; 2023 Mar; 44(5-6):558-562. PubMed ID: 36495094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fabrication of circular microfluidic channels by combining mechanical micromilling and soft lithography.
    Wilson ME; Kota N; Kim Y; Wang Y; Stolz DB; LeDuc PR; Ozdoganlar OB
    Lab Chip; 2011 Apr; 11(8):1550-5. PubMed ID: 21399830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 3D Printed Platform for Impedimetric Sensing of Liquids and Microfluidic Channels.
    Sebechlebská T; Vaněčková E; Choińska-Młynarczyk MK; Navrátil T; Poltorak L; Bonini A; Vivaldi F; Kolivoška V
    Anal Chem; 2022 Oct; 94(41):14426-14433. PubMed ID: 36200526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Additive manufacturing of three-dimensional (3D) microfluidic-based microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) for acoustofluidic applications.
    Cesewski E; Haring AP; Tong Y; Singh M; Thakur R; Laheri S; Read KA; Powell MD; Oestreich KJ; Johnson BN
    Lab Chip; 2018 Jul; 18(14):2087-2098. PubMed ID: 29897358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.