These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33377193)

  • 1. Using propensity scores to estimate effects of treatment initiation decisions: State of the science.
    Webster-Clark M; Stürmer T; Wang T; Man K; Marinac-Dabic D; Rothman KJ; Ellis AR; Gokhale M; Lunt M; Girman C; Glynn RJ
    Stat Med; 2021 Mar; 40(7):1718-1735. PubMed ID: 33377193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Stuart EA; Lee BK; Leacy FP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S84-S90.e1. PubMed ID: 23849158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Propensity Score-Based Estimators With Multiple Error-Prone Covariates.
    Hong H; Aaby DA; Siddique J; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):222-230. PubMed ID: 30358801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological considerations when analysing and interpreting real-world data.
    Stürmer T; Wang T; Golightly YM; Keil A; Lund JL; Jonsson Funk M
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2020 Jan; 59(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 31834408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores via the Overlap Weights.
    Li F; Thomas LE; Li F
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):250-257. PubMed ID: 30189042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of parametric propensity score-based methods for causal inference with multiple treatments and a binary outcome.
    Yu Y; Zhang M; Shi X; Caram MEV; Little RJA; Mukherjee B
    Stat Med; 2021 Mar; 40(7):1653-1677. PubMed ID: 33462862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research.
    Harder VS; Stuart EA; Anthony JC
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):234-49. PubMed ID: 20822250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
    Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initiator Types and the Causal Question of the Prevalent New-User Design: A Simulation Study.
    Webster-Clark M; Ross RK; Lund JL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 190(7):1341-1348. PubMed ID: 33350433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.
    Franklin JM; Eddings W; Austin PC; Stuart EA; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 28208229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indications for propensity scores and review of their use in pharmacoepidemiology.
    Glynn RJ; Schneeweiss S; Stürmer T
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2006 Mar; 98(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 16611199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity scores: from naive enthusiasm to intuitive understanding.
    Williamson E; Morley R; Lucas A; Carpenter J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Jun; 21(3):273-93. PubMed ID: 21262780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].
    Pattanayak CW; Rubin DB; Zell ER
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):897-903. PubMed ID: 21872981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimizing bias in massive multi-arm observational studies with BCAUS: balancing covariates automatically using supervision.
    Belthangady C; Stedden W; Norgeot B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):190. PubMed ID: 34544367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two basic statistical strategies of conducting causal inference in real-world studies.
    Fang Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Dec; 99():106193. PubMed ID: 33153972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propensity score methods to control for confounding in observational cohort studies: a statistical primer and application to endoscopy research.
    Yang JY; Webster-Clark M; Lund JL; Sandler RS; Dellon ES; Stürmer T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Sep; 90(3):360-369. PubMed ID: 31051156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of Propensity Scoring and Its Application to Real-World Data: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Methodological Objectives Explained to Researchers Without Using Mathematical Equations.
    Franchetti Y
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2022 Mar; 62(3):304-319. PubMed ID: 34671990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Propensity score matching in otolaryngologic literature: A systematic review and critical appraisal.
    Prasad A; Shin M; Carey RM; Chorath K; Parhar H; Appel S; Moreira A; Rajasekaran K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244423. PubMed ID: 33382777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
    Schuler MS; Rose S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.