These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transthoracic Versus Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis. Mertens AC; Kalff MC; Eshuis WJ; Van Gulik TM; Van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):175-183. PubMed ID: 32607607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches. Weksler B; Sullivan JL Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan. Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Is Associated with Superior Survival Compared to Open Surgery. Ising MS; Smith SA; Trivedi JR; Martin RCG; Phillips P; Van Berkel V; Fox MP Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):1833-1843. PubMed ID: 35317621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study. Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Mitzman B; Lutfi W; Wang CH; Krantz S; Howington JA; Kim KW Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Summer; 29(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 28823338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches. Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy. van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing Perioperative Mortality and Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Analysis. Sakamoto T; Fujiogi M; Matsui H; Fushimi K; Yasunaga H Ann Surg; 2021 Aug; 274(2):324-330. PubMed ID: 31356263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Better Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Than Open Esophagectomy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer. Terayama M; Okamura A; Kuriyama K; Takahashi N; Tamura M; Kanamori J; Imamura Y; Watanabe M Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Sep; 31(9):5748-5756. PubMed ID: 38896227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy. Hayami M; Ndegwa N; Lindblad M; Linder G; Hedberg J; Edholm D; Johansson J; Lagergren J; Lundell L; Nilsson M; Rouvelas I Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):5609-5621. PubMed ID: 35752726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy. Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer? Li J; Shen Y; Tan L; Feng M; Wang H; Xi Y; Wang Q Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):925-30. PubMed ID: 25249141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]