These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33378429)

  • 21. Soft tissue images from cephalograms compared with those from a 3D surface acquisition system.
    Incrapera AK; Kau CH; English JD; McGrory K; Sarver DM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 19852641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.
    Ludlow JB; Gubler M; Cevidanes L; Mol A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. PubMed ID: 19732656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identification of 'Point A' as the prevalent source of error in cephalometric analysis of lateral radiographs.
    Grogger P; Sacher C; Weber S; Millesi G; Seemann R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1322-1329. PubMed ID: 29650356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A preliminary study of computer recognition and identification of skeletal landmarks as a new method of cephalometric analysis.
    Cohen AM; Ip HH; Linney AD
    Br J Orthod; 1984 Jul; 11(3):143-54. PubMed ID: 6591953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Subtraction radiography to assess reproducibility of patient positioning in cephalometrics.
    Kantor ML; Phillips CL; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Oct; 104(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 8213656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The reliability of head film measurements. 3. Tracing superimposition.
    Baumrind S; Miller D; Molthen R
    Am J Orthod; 1976 Dec; 70(6):617-44. PubMed ID: 1069480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.
    Katkar RA; Kummet C; Dawson D; Moreno Uribe L; Allareddy V; Finkelstein M; Ruprecht A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130059. PubMed ID: 23833319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The angle between the Frankfort horizontal and the sella-nasion line. Changes in porion and orbitale position during growth.
    Greiner P; Müller B; Dibbets J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 May; 65(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15160248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of hand-traced and computer-based cephalometric superimpositions.
    Huja SS; Grubaugh EL; Rummel AM; Fields HW; Beck FM
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):428-35. PubMed ID: 19413396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improved lateral cephalometric superimposition using an automated image fitting technique.
    Larson BE; Sievers MM; Ko CC
    Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):474-9. PubMed ID: 20050739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images.
    Yu SH; Nahm DS; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e1-6; discussion e1. PubMed ID: 18538235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in bimaxillary osteotomies: single-piece versus 3-piece maxilla.
    Kretschmer WB; Baciut G; Baciut M; Zoder W; Wangerin K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):372-80. PubMed ID: 20116710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods.
    Albarakati SF; Kula KS; Ghoneima AA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jan; 41(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 22184624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Using three-dimensional craniofacial images to construct horizontal reference plane].
    Kim MJ; Liu Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Oct; 51(5):937-943. PubMed ID: 31624402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. 3D landmarks of Craniofacial Imaging and subsequent considerations on superimpositions in orthodontics-The Aarhus perspective.
    Cattaneo PM; Yung AKC; Holm A; Mashaly OM; Cornelis MA
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2019 May; 22 Suppl 1():21-29. PubMed ID: 31074143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Establishment of a prediction method for the mid-facial region of unknown human Mongoloid skeletal remains.
    Utsuno H; Kageyama T; Uchida K; Ishii N; Minegishi S; Uemura K; Sakurada K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():297-303. PubMed ID: 29800936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
    Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on various skeletal structures of the head using surface models.
    Gkantidis N; Schauseil M; Pazera P; Zorkun B; Katsaros C; Ludwig B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0118810. PubMed ID: 25706151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.