These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33378442)

  • 21. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics.
    Kokich VO; Kiyak HA; Shapiro PA
    J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(6):311-24. PubMed ID: 10825866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics.
    Pinho S; Ciriaco C; Faber J; Lenza MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 18068592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics.
    Roden-Johnson D; Gallerano R; English J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 15775949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Smile preferences of orthodontists, general dentists, patients, and the general public in three-quarter and lateral views.
    Pasukdee P; Cheng JH; Chen DS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Apr; 159(4):e311-e320. PubMed ID: 33568274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Morphological Simulation of Different Incisal Embrasures: Perception of Laypersons, Orthodontic Patients, General Dentists and Orthodontists.
    Eduarda Assad Duarte M; Martins Machado R; Fonseca Jardim da Motta A; Nelson Mucha J; Trindade Motta A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Feb; 29(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27767236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of the perception of smile esthetics by laypersons, dental students and dental practitioners.
    Cracel-Nogueira F; Pinho T
    Int Orthod; 2013 Dec; 11(4):432-44. PubMed ID: 24427802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of maxillary canine torque variations on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
    Lemos TCB; Vasconcelos JB; Santos BMD; Machado AW
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019; 24(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 30916249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination.
    Ghaleb N; Bouserhal J; Bassil-Nassif N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 20716642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceptions of dental esthetics of Asian orthodontists and laypersons.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Chan YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 16905060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Smile attractiveness perception regarding buccal corridor size among different facial types.
    Mollabashi V; Abolvardi M; Akhlaghian M; Ghaffari MI
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(3):305-312. PubMed ID: 30328309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Smile microesthetics as perceived by dental professionals and laypersons.
    Alomari SA; Alhaija ESA; AlWahadni AM; Al-Tawachi AK
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Jan; 92(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 34520516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of buccolingual inclinations of maxillary canines and premolars on perceived smile attractiveness.
    Xu H; Han X; Wang Y; Shu R; Jing Y; Tian Y; Andrews WA; Andrews LF; Bai D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 25636551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of the vertical position of maxillary central incisors on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
    Machado AW; McComb RW; Moon W; Gandini LG
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Dec; 25(6):392-401. PubMed ID: 24180675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of nonextraction and extraction orthodontic treatments on smile esthetics for different malocclusions.
    Cheng HC; Wang YC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 29287659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does different vertical position of maxillary central incisors in women with different facial vertical height affect smile esthetics perception?
    Atik E; Turkoglu H
    Prog Orthod; 2023 Aug; 24(1):28. PubMed ID: 37544965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.
    Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 24582021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of nasal deviation on the perception of maxillary dental centreline and smile aesthetics.
    Grimes K; Fleming PS; Sharma PK
    J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 50(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 35527703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of variations in maxillary lateral incisor dimensions on smile esthetics.
    Haerian A; Rafiei E; Joshan N; Eghbali R; Tehrani PF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jan; 161(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 34417035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Extraction of maxillary canines: Esthetic perceptions of patient smiles among dental professionals and laypeople.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Javidi H; Griffiths SE; Shah AA; Sandler J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):509-515. PubMed ID: 28962736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceptions of Jordanian laypersons and dental professionals to altered smile aesthetics.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Al-Shamsi NO; Al-Khateeb S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 21041837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.