BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33378466)

  • 1. Surface Roughness on the Slots and Wings of Various Ceramic Self-Ligating Brackets and their Potential Concern on Biofilm Formation.
    Park KH; Han SJ; Choi S; Kim KS; Park S; Park JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020 Dec; 44(6):451-458. PubMed ID: 33378466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of fine particle shot peening on surface friction of stainless steel and ceramic bracket slots.
    Tribumrungsuk P; Khantachawana A; Janyaprasert K
    Dent Mater J; 2022 Oct; 41(5):682-687. PubMed ID: 35644570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantitative AFM analysis of nano-scale surface roughness in various orthodontic brackets.
    Lee GJ; Park KH; Park YG; Park HK
    Micron; 2010 Oct; 41(7):775-82. PubMed ID: 20646928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.
    Loftus BP; Artun J; Nicholls JI; Alonzo TA; Stoner JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 10474108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of self-ligating brackets on the surfaces of stainless steel wires following clinical use: AFM investigation.
    Choi S; Joo HJ; Cheong Y; Park YG; Park HK
    J Microsc; 2012 Apr; 246(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 22188518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of friction force between Lock-loose bracket and traditional bracket].
    Xiaowei L; Luyi Y; Huifang Z; Yan D; Qi W; Wei J; Yanran W
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 32(6):570-4. PubMed ID: 25665422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
    Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface analysis of metal clips of ceramic self-ligating brackets.
    Kim KS; Han SJ; Lee TH; Park TJ; Choi S; Kang YG; Park KH
    Korean J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 49(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 30603621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.
    Griffiths HS; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):670-5; quiz 754. PubMed ID: 15953891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
    Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the sliding resistance between three models of self-ligating ceramic brackets: An in vitro and micro-morphological study.
    Bazergan N; Nicolas E; El Helou M
    Int Orthod; 2023 Mar; 21(1):100719. PubMed ID: 36577305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between frictional force and surface roughness of orthodontic archwires.
    Choi S; Hwang EY; Park HK; Park YG
    Scanning; 2015; 37(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 26018223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
    Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of frictional forces between ceramic brackets and archwires of different alloys compared with metal brackets.
    Guerrero AP; Guariza Filho O; Tanaka O; Camargo ES; Vieira S
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 20339712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
    Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of friction forces between stainless steel wires and "reduced-friction" self-ligating brackets.
    Reznikov N; Har-Zion G; Barkana I; Abed Y; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 20816303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets.
    Pizzoni L; Ravnholt G; Melsen B
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 9699406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Ricciardi A; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 14560269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
    Rajakulendran J; Jones S
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.