These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33378479)
1. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis? Ting S; Attaia D; Johnson KB; Kossa SS; Friedland B; Allareddy V; Masoud MI Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 33378479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging. Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics. Signorelli L; Patcas R; Peltomäki T; Schätzle M J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 26747662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols. Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone-beam computed tomography. Ludlow JB; Walker C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):802-17. PubMed ID: 24286904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of thyroid gland shielding on radiation doses in dental cone beam computed tomography with small and medium fields of view. Grüning M; Koivisto J; Mah J; Bumann A Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2022 Aug; 134(2):245-253. PubMed ID: 35534405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT. Wrzesień M; Olszewski J Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of field of view (FOV) positioning and shielding on radiation dose in paediatric CBCT. Vogiatzi T; Menz R; Verna C; Bornstein MM; Dagassan-Berndt D Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Sep; 51(6):20210316. PubMed ID: 35762346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography. Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose reduction in head and neck organs through shielding and application of different scanning parameters in cone beam computed tomography: an effective dose study using an adult male anthropomorphic phantom. Attaia D; Ting S; Johnson B; Masoud MI; Friedland B; Abu El Fotouh M; Abu El Sadat S Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Jul; 130(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 31982369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of thyroid gland shielding in dental CBCT using a paediatric anthropomorphic phantom. Hidalgo A; Davies J; Horner K; Theodorakou C Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(3):20140285. PubMed ID: 25411710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hand-wrist, knee, and foot-ankle dosimetry and image quality measurements of a novel extremity imaging unit providing CBCT and 2D imaging options. Ludlow JB Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):4955-4963. PubMed ID: 30229941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetry in CBCT with Different Protocols: Emphasis on Small FOVs Including Exams for TMJ. Nascimento HAR; Andrade MEA; Frazão MAG; Nascimento EHL; Ramos-Perez FMM; Freitas DQ Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(4):511-516. PubMed ID: 29160405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Convex triangular vs. cylindrical field of view: how does the shape of the FOV affect radiation dose? Cascante-Sequeira D; Oliveira-Santos C; Brasil DM; Santaella GM; Swanson C; Blackburn M; Scarfe WC; Haiter-Neto F Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7881-7888. PubMed ID: 37993703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography. Al-Okshi A; Nilsson M; Petersson A; Wiese M; Lindh C Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120343. PubMed ID: 23610090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose distributions in adult and child head phantoms for panoramic and cone beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint. Iskanderani D; Nilsson M; Alstergren P; Hellén-Halme K Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Aug; 130(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 32094027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]