164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33378492)
1. Assessment of available sites for palatal orthodontic mini-implants through cone-beam computed tomography.
Lyu X; Guo J; Chen L; Gao Y; Liu L; Pu L; Lai W; Long H
Angle Orthod; 2020 Jul; 90(4):516-523. PubMed ID: 33378492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Fayed MM; Pazera P; Katsaros C
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of interradicular space, soft tissue, and hard tissue of the posterior palatal alveolar process for orthodontic mini-implant, using cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee JA; Ahn HW; Oh SH; Park KH; Kim SH; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Apr; 159(4):460-469. PubMed ID: 33526299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Palatal mucosal measurements in a Japanese population using cone-beam computed tomography.
Ueno D; Sekiguchi R; Morita M; Jayawardena A; Shinpo S; Sato J; Kobayashi K
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 24548316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial intelligence-assisted determination of available sites for palatal orthodontic mini implants based on palatal thickness through CBCT.
Tao T; Zou K; Jiang R; He K; He X; Zhang M; Wu Z; Shen X; Yuan X; Lai W; Long H
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Aug; 26(3):491-499. PubMed ID: 36680384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
Yang L; Li F; Cao M; Chen H; Wang X; Chen X; Yang L; Gao W; Petrone JF; Ding Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 26038077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anatomical assessment by cone beam computed tomography with the use of lateral cephalograms to analyse the vertical bone height of the anterior palate for orthodontic mini-implants.
Möhlhenrich SC; Kniha K; Peters F; Chhatwani S; Prescher A; Hölzle F; Modabber A; Danesh G
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Feb; 24(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 32608152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness for Insertion of Orthodontic Mini-Implants in Adults and Adolescents.
Wang M; Sun Y; Yu Y; Ding X
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 28(6):1468-1471. PubMed ID: 28841595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Morphometric analysis of the infrazygomatic crest zone in 84 mini-implants using cone-beam CT].
Jia XT; Huang XF
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jan; 53(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 29972957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of sex dimorphisms of the thickness of the hard palate in adolescence using computed tomography: Pilot study.
Aleshkina O; Suetenkov D; Dydykin S; Vasil'ev Y; Paulsen F; Firsova I; Bikbaeva T; Polkovova I
Ann Anat; 2021 Nov; 238():151764. PubMed ID: 34004269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of median and paramedian regions for planning palatal mini-implants: a study in vivo using cone beam computed tomography.
de Rezende Barbosa GL; Ramírez-Sotelo LR; Távora DM; Almeida SM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 43(10):1265-8. PubMed ID: 24846198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative investigation of palatal bone depth and cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement in adults.
Baumgaertel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 19577156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is there an ideal insertion angle and position for orthodontic mini-implants in the anterior palate? A CBCT study in humans.
Becker K; Unland J; Wilmes B; Tarraf NE; Drescher D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):345-354. PubMed ID: 31474264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of palatal support tissues for placement of orthodontic mini-implants in mouth breathers with high-narrow palates versus nose breathers with normal palates: a retrospective study.
Kang Q; Cha C; Huang D; Zuo S; Yan X
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1259-1267. PubMed ID: 31302770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the bone thickness of the palate on cone-beam computed tomography for placement of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliances.
Negrisoli S; Angelieri F; Gonçalves JR; da Silva HDP; Maltagliati LÁ; Raphaelli Nahás-Scocate AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jun; 161(6):849-857. PubMed ID: 35151529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Palatal bone thickness compared with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents and adults for mini-implant placement.
Ryu JH; Park JH; Vu Thi Thu T; Bayome M; Kim Y; Kook YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 22858330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the soft tissue thickness and greater palatine foramen location in the palate.
Yilmaz HG; Boke F; Ayali A
J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):458-61. PubMed ID: 25817728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone and soft tissue palatal morphology and potential anchorage sides in cleft palate patients.
Moscarino S; Scholz J; Bastian A; Knaup I; Wolf M
Ann Anat; 2019 Jul; 224():41-46. PubMed ID: 30953811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the palatal bone in different facial patterns for orthodontic mini-implants insertion: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Vidalón JA; Liñan C; Tay LY; Meneses A; Lagravère M
Dental Press J Orthod; 2021; 26(1):e2119204. PubMed ID: 33759963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
