122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33378802)
21. Proportion of women with self-reported opportunistic mammography before organized screening.
Heikkinen S; Miettinen J; Koskenvuo M; Huovinen R; Pitkäniemi J; Sarkeala T; Malila N
Acta Oncol; 2016 Jul; 55(7):865-9. PubMed ID: 27144814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A cross sectional study on the motivators for Asian women to attend opportunistic mammography screening in a private hospital in Malaysia: the MyMammo study.
Hassan N; Ho WK; Mariapun S; Teo SH
BMC Public Health; 2015 Jun; 15():548. PubMed ID: 26065413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Analysis for the breast cancer screening among urban populations in China, 2012-2013].
Mi ZH; Ren JS; Zhang HZ; Li J; Wang Y; Fang Y; Shi JF; Zhang K; Zhao JB; Dai M
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 50(10):887-892. PubMed ID: 27686767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of a population-based breast cancer screening in North China.
Wu S; Liang D; Shi J; Li D; Liu Y; Hao Y; Shi M; Du X; He Y
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Sep; 149(12):10119-10130. PubMed ID: 37266660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.
Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors Impacting False Positive Recall in Screening Mammography.
Honig EL; Mullen LA; Amir T; Alvin MD; Jones MK; Ambinder EB; Falomo ET; Harvey SC
Acad Radiol; 2019 Nov; 26(11):1505-1512. PubMed ID: 30772138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment.
Health Quality Ontario
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2016; 16(15):1-71. PubMed ID: 27468326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. What Happens after a Diagnosis of High-Risk Breast Lesion at Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy? An Observational Study of Postdiagnosis Management and Imaging Adherence.
Gao Y; Albert M; Young Lin LL; Lewin AA; Babb JS; Heller SL; Moy L
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):423-431. PubMed ID: 29378151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Are prognostic factors more favorable for breast cancer detected by organized screening than by opportunistic screening or clinical diagnosis? A study in Loire-Atlantique (France).
Vanier A; Leux C; Allioux C; Billon-Delacour S; Lombrail P; Molinié F
Cancer Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):683-7. PubMed ID: 23880147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Screening MRI in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
Lehman CD; Lee JM; DeMartini WB; Hippe DS; Rendi MH; Kalish G; Porter P; Gralow J; Partridge SC
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Mar; 108(3):. PubMed ID: 26744477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Breast ultrasound optimization process analysis based on breast cancer screening for 1 501 753 rural women in China].
Ma L; Lian ZQ; Zhao YX; Di JL; Song B; Ren WH; Miao HZ; Wu JL; Wang Q
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 43(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 33902214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast Cancer Detection Rate, Incidence, Prevalence and Interval Cancer-related Mammography Screening Times among Thai Women.
Sripaiboonkij N; Thinkamrop B; Promthet S; Kannawat C; Tangcharoensathien V; Ansusing T; Rattanamongkolgul S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(8):4137-41. PubMed ID: 27644674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Organized versus Opportunistic Screening for Breast Cancer in Austria.
Schiller-Fruehwirth I; Jahn B; Einzinger P; Zauner G; Urach C; Siebert U
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1048-1057. PubMed ID: 28964436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Study on the coverage of cervical and breast cancer screening among women aged 35-69 years and related impact of socioeconomic factors in China, 2013].
Bao HL; Wang LH; Wang LM; Fang LW; Zhang M; Zhao ZP; Cong S
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Feb; 39(2):208-212. PubMed ID: 29495207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009-2012.
White A; Miller J; Royalty J; Ryerson AB; Benard V; Helsel W; Kammerer W
Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 25809209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
